The time has come. Even though I was warned off by Crazy Ralph, a.k.a Stacie, I went ahead and watched The Eye (2007). This is of course the remake of the Asian title by the same name, well the English translated name anyway. I took the warning seriously, even though Stacie and I don't always agree. Where would the fun be in that if we agreed every time? Since I planned on watching it, and it was already here before I got warned away, why send it back unwatched? If I'm anything, its dedicated to watching horror movies. Sometimes a little too much! Is this one of those times I don't agree with the almighty Stacie? Or was her warning something everyone should take to heart?For those of you that didn't read my write up for the original film, The Eye is a story about Sydney Wells (Jessica Alba). Sydney was blinded by some fireworks when she was five years old. Now she is going through a cornea transplant that will hopefully restore her sight. The surgery is a success, although everything is nothing more than a blur for a while. To prevent her from being overwhelmed by being able to see things now, and to learn what these things are, Sydney is teamed up with Dr. Paul Faulkner (Alessandro Nivola). Not everything that Sydney sees are things that most everyone else can. Once Sydney realizes this, she starts to try and find out who she got the corneas from, since she didn't have this problem until after the surgery.
For being warned off this film, I was surprised by the number of good reviews that it gets. I often see debates on which film was the better one, when it comes to remakes. I have always had a theory about this, which applies more to the original film being one from overseas and being remade by Hollywood. My theory is that it all depends on which one you see first. This isn't always true, but I have noticed that most people side with the one they happened to see first. More often than not, it applies to me as well. The Eye is a tough call as to which I would like best, if I had watched this remake first. I think it might have been one of those times my theory wouldn't work, because there are just a few reasons why I liked the original film more.
Those that haven't watched the original film, are probably the ones that are giving it the better reviews. That isn't always true, since the web site Slasherpool, whom I agree with more times than not, gives this version of The Eye four out of five stars. This was even after admitting to having liked the original film more. Of course, they also gave The Eye 10 a high score, and I didn't. Having already watched the original film, just a few days ago at that, I realized something about this remake, that I may not have picked up on otherwise. The Eye tries too hard to be scary. This remake is, more or less, a direct remake of the original. Very little was changed. In fact, you can find some of the same shots. Outside of the change in location, you can find two major changes to this remake. One change was in the ending. It ends on a happier note this time around. The other change is that there are more ghosts to be found. The dark shadow is still there, except now it seems more scary and threatening. I don't think it took notice of our main character before, but this time it does...and growls at her. I probably wouldn't have thought about it at all, just took it for what it is, along with all the other new ghosts that can be found here, if I hadn't already watched the original film. Because I have though, it has made me realize that the original film was much more subtle while it was trying to scare you. The Eye offers up a lot more jump scares, which probably wouldn't have bothered me nearly as much, if I had watched this film first. I have to admit that one such jump scare did manage to get me.
The effects seem to be strictly the CGI type with no blood, except for some bloody tears seen once in a while. The effects aren't bad really. The burned bodies looked pretty good, but I am getting just a tad tired of seeing so much CGI in a film. Many people have made fun of Jessica Alba, saying she just can't act, and this film is proof of that. I didn't have such a problem with her. I thought some of the scenes could have been better, but I bought into her character. I thought Jessica did a better job with conveying that she was happy about having her sight restored, and being overwhelmed at first by it, than Angelica Lee did in the original. The role of the doctor was changed just a little. He remains a love interest for out main character, but this time comes across as a bit of an asshole at times.
The Eye separates itself from the original by adding a few more ghosts, and changing the ending. It also does so by getting deeper into the reason Sydney is seeing things. There is a scene that talks about how other people with transplants have picked up habits they didn't have before surgery, but were habits of the person they got the organ from. All very interesting, but the first film didn't go there, and to be truthful, it didn't need to. It is pretty self explanatory, at least I thought so. The changed ending has some people mad, including myself. Well, I'm not really mad, I just didn't care for it. It did bring up an interesting debate on the forums though. Which is better to have: a happy ending, or an open ending, or an ending that ends on a down beat? I think it all depends on the movie. How things were played out before the ending of the film should be a big factor in the ending. There is a film that I have reviewed that will remain nameless, just in case you haven't watched it. I don't want to spoil it for anyone. But in this movie we watch a person being stabbed, and his death being recorded so that they have it on film. At the movie's end, we discover that he isn't dead after all, giving it a happy ending. Happy endings have their place, but I felt that one was in the wrong place. Same here, if you are stuck in traffic and a woman you have never seen before suddenly starts pounding on your window, telling you to get out because you are going to die, what are you going to do? Will you sit there and think, "Oh shit, I need to get out of here." Or would you sit there and think, "Ok crazy lady. What the fuck ever."
I guess I didn't feel The Eye was bad enough to be warned away from, but I still ended up not caring about it all that much. Sorry, but I will take a film that isn't trying hard to scare me, as opposed to one that is. I give this one credit for making me jump, and almost making me say, "Oh shit!" Still, if you can get the original film, I would suggest watching it over this remake, even though I didn't think very highly of either film. Not the best series I have reviewed, but it was still a fun one to get through. Next up, a guest review!
2 out of 5 Was the obvious body double shot really needed?

6 comments:
Well, it's good you didn't come away from it wanting to kill yourself.
The oven scene was...oh, the oven scene.
And I didn't like the revamped ending.
BAH I SAY!
Hello Aqua-lass,
This has no connection to The Eye, but I had to bring it to your attention because I know it's a pet peeve of yours and traded words about it before. Apparently you're not the only one who hates it when folks call 28 Days Later a zombie movie. Creator and director Danny Boyle hates it too. From the MTV Movies Blog:
What else? Not to go all Columbo on you here at the end, but Boyle, well, he does have just one more thing he wants from you: for the love of all that is holy, stop calling his infected monsters zombies.
"There was an article in the paper the other day by Simon Pegg. He wrote this article begging people to let zombies stumble again and not run. He was trying to turn the tide back because everyone has zombies running now. He’s like, 'No, please. Can we go back to the old days when you knew you could get away from them?' That was sort of the thrill. These idiots didn’t lock themselves in car and died," Boyle laughed. "That's why I keep saying, 'It's not a zombie movie, everyone. It's not a zombie movie!' Because the aficionados - it's sacrilegious what you're doing by changing things like that. They're infected. They’re not zombies."
You were right and I was wrong.
Thanks for letting me know about that. I personally don't have a problem with fast zombies. I can see how the newly dead zombies, ones that just died and came back as zombies in other words, will be fast at first. But since they have the whole dead thing going on, I don't think they would be fast for a long period of time.
Since they aren't zombies in that film, or its sequel (glad to see that you have come around), they can be as fast as they want to be.
Good write-up on this film. I'm a big fan of the Asian original. I went into this one with trepidation. It wasn't as bad as I thought it might be. It wasn't a a great film, but not the worse thing I've ever seen. I wouldn't highly recommend, but I wouldn't tell someone to avoid it at all cost either.
Well howdy Miss Heather. I actually found this one an interesting review. I think I have managed to watch all of the Eye movies to date, both the Asian and American versions. But without a scorecard, that these often make me feel I need, I can not be sure that this is the only one I have not watched yet, lol.
Shucks maam, you know how I tend to be on series. If for not other reason than to say, ok, you have now watched the entire series, I do tend to watch the movies. I think I will probably do the same with this one at some point. But I will probably wait until it hits cable shortly too, lol.
I do agree with your assessment about which style movie ending is the best too smart lady. If I have the correct Eye 1, Asian original, in mind I really felt that its ending worked well for me. Especially given that the movie tended to be "dark" to me throughout, the ending simply seemed to work and make sense. With the original, given its dark tone, throwing a "Walt Disney" type ending onto it would have seemed absurd to me.
Of course, since I make no secret of the fact that I enjoy a well done paranormal horror, adding more ghosts into this one would not offend me in the least. Even if it departs from the original in that respect. But if it managed to keep that "dark tone" that I liked so much in the original, a Walt Disney type ending would not work for me to be honest.
Oh well, at least I will go into this one with my eyes wide open (no pun intended) thanks to the flippered femme fatale (smiling, tips my hat).
Howdy Miss Heather. If you are not, please sit down before you read any further, as I do not want to put an undue shock on that incredible body (sticks out tongue). I have finally caught back up and posted a comment for every review since I went AWOL on your the first time sweet lady.
So now I can finally say it again, which puts a big grin on my face - FEED ME, FEED ME, my dark side is starving for another one of your incredible reviews, hehehe.
Oh man, that feels so great being able to type again (smiling, tips my hat).
Post a Comment