Monday, July 30, 2007

Ghoulicious

This is the last, hopefully, film that I have that was directed by Joe Castro. I have nothing against him. I just haven't found a movie that impresses me a whole lot. I will say that the movie I watched today, Near Death (2004), does manage to come close. Don't get your hopes up too high though. It didn't come that close. I do have some good news to give to you all. Well, it is good news to me at least. Post number 250 is getting closer with each review. This one puts me at 241 if you are wondering. I have a movie in mind for that post but I haven't decided if that will be the movie I will pick for it yet. Since I haven't done a tribute post in a while now, I think I will throw one of those in before I hit 250. I have someone in mind for that as well. And last, but not least, the next review will be the start of another series review. I was supposed to get the last of four movies in the mail Saturday, but it didn't show up. Hopefully it will today. I think that is all I wanted to pass on so now, the review.

Near Death centers around June Rivera (Perrine Moore). She is doing research on a curse that has turned into a legend. She is doing the research for a book and has managed to get Tammy (Ali Willingham) and Billy (Scott Lunsford) to help her with it. They go to this big house that was once owned by Willie Von Brahm (Carl Darchuck). Legend has it that he murdered a young woman, Maria (also played by Perrine Moore). There was no real proof of this but her mother believed it so much that she cursed Von Brahm and all who was in his house. The curse is that they can't ever leave the house, if they do then they will die. Von Brahm throws himself off a cliff though so maybe the curse does work. In death, Von Brahm is holding the souls of the people left in the house hostage. So if they leave the house, not only will they die, they will also lose their souls forever. At least I think that is how the plot worked itself out. The way it all worked out is that the remaining people aren't dead but they aren't truely alive either. Instead, they are now ghouls that eat the living. Will our group figure out what is going on and find Maria's body, thus breaking the curse?

Near Death is a movie that tries to be too much. This is evident in the effects more than anywhere else. There are two types of effects to be found. The old fashion makeup effects and the newer CGI effects. In both cases, there were things I liked and things I thought could have been left on the cutting room floor. The opening effect wasn't a good sign of things to come. One woman gets her throat cut open and this happened so quickly that I couldn't tell if this was sped up or if there was some kind of edit cut in there. Either way, it didn't look very good. Another big mistake is when the ghouls are eating. They make it look like they are eating nothing more than a dark jello. One thing I did like though is when one the ghouls does try to leave the house in search of food. He starts to melt away and when he pulls his shirt off, his flesh goes with it. However, they did manage to mess even that up by adding some unwanted CGI effects. Not all of the CGI effects were bad but I thought alot of them were not needed. Sometimes I felt they found an effect that they thought went well with the movie so they tried to push it more. That was when they went to far with the effects. If they had kept them simple it would have looked a whole lot better.

The acting is also a mixed bag. I liked Ali Willingham and Scott Lunsford was ok. The lead actress, Perrine Moore, was good as Maria but not as good as June. I don't know why that was the case. Maybe because Maria had fewer lines. I have no idea. The ghouls were ok as well but had a way of over acting at times. They were Brannon Gould, Joe Haggerty, Marieno Savoie and Darlene Tygrett. You will also find Scott St. James, Joseph Commesso and Billy Bicskei.

Another problem with Near Death is the plot holes. We discover that these people have been trapped in the house since the 1940's. At the start of the movie, they have hired a guy that is working as a bartender to bring them their supper. They pay him a gold coin per body. When he discovers where they keep this gold, he tries to take all of it but gets caught. The ghouls then use him as their supper. After this they are upset because they have no idea where their next meal will be coming from. They have no phone (stressed earlier in the movie) and they can't leave the house. This begs the question, how did they manage to hire this guy in the first place then? It also made me wonder why the police weren't poking around this bar where missing people were last seen at.

At one point, the ghouls go on the attack. Our group barely has to touch them and their heads split open revealing their skulls. One of them even has a rat in her mouth that wasn't there before. It was things like this that pushed it from an "oh cool" moment into the realm of silly. The plot wasn't the best around but I kind of liked it. If only they had not tried as hard as they did and put way too many effects in. Sometimes less is better. Always nice to have wow moments but it is better to have only a few effects that will be remembered as great instead of a bunch of effects that will make people end up laughing. I can't really suggest this one for anyone though unless you are just crazy over bad movies. Maybe I will have better luck with my next set of movies.
2 out of 5 Wishing for better movies (a hint to the next series review)

Sunday, July 29, 2007

Rubber Monsters

Bad movies like me for some reason. I have never gone through all of my reviews to find out how many movies fall into each rating. Maybe it would be interesting to find out. In truth, I think that the good movies might be even, or I have watched more of them, than bad movies. Some show their colors pretty quickly but I have discovered that I shouldn't give up on a movie too quick because sometimes, though not too often, they can get better. I don't know if a movie is good or bad until I watch it so that is a risk I run. The people that I trust with reviews have yet to watch Legend Of The Chupacabra (2000) so I just had to go with it. In a way, watching a really bad movie is good for you. It just goes to show you what bad film making really is. There are some movies I have reviewed that I probably would not have liked near as well if I had not watched another movie that was even worse. As you read through my reviews, keep that in mind. I'm not saying all my 3 star reviews fall into place like that. There have been a few that I would read very bad reviews for and I would think, "If you think this movie is bad, you should watch this other one and then you will truely understand the meaning of bad." I'm not trying to scare you away from this review, trust me.

Legend Of The Chupacabra will remind you of the Blair Witch Project. I will go ahead and throw that out there right now. It was filmed in a documentary style. It starts off by giving some background information about the chupacabra. Some of the information dropped in is of course made up so that it will fit the plot of the movie better. You will also find different interviews with other "experts" through out the movie. They often talk about what we had just watched or are about to watch and their views on it. A team of people, lead by cryptozoologist Maria Esperanza (Katsy Joiner) go to a small Texas town near the Mexico border. The animals in this town are mysteriously being killed off and a video tape is said to have shown a ranch owner being killed by the chupacabra on it. This ranch owner just happens to be Maria's uncle so it's personal now. It doesn't take long at all for the chupacabra to show itself to the would-be film makers and the rest of the movie is them trying to capture or kill the creature.

I was rather disappointed with the effects. I'm not saying they were bad actually, I just wish they had done them differently. The chupacabra looked neat but it made me want to laugh more than cringe in fear. A lot of that had to do with its tongue. I know that sounds like a stupid thing to laugh at but it managed to do that to me. Some people that claim to have seen a chupacabra, say that it has a long tongue. It is believed that it uses its tongue to suck the blood from the things it attacks. In Legend Of The Chupacabra, they stay true to that. It was funny to me to see this real long tongue do nothing other than basicly flop around. The gore effects is mainly what I had wished they done differently. They went for gross out effects. You will find very little blood but a lot of guts. Doesn't make a lot of sense does it? You would think in order to see the guts there would also be a lot of blood but maybe I am missing something. There is a severed arm at one point. What made this funny, yes even this managed to be funny, is that the man's arm got smaller in diameter once it was severed.

The acting was just ok once again. I didn't have too big of a problem with the acting. I though Katsy Joiner was pretty good over all. There were times I didn't care for her acting but it was nothing major. IMDb lists Legend Of The Chupacabra as her first and only movie. I was going to give the rest of her crew here but whoever plugged the information about the movie into the web site didn't give all the of the character names to go with the actors. So, here is who else was in this movie: J.T. Trevino, Chris Doughton, Stan McKinney, Sandy Swartz, Lewis Sarkozi and Kevin Sloan as the chupacabra.

Joe Castro was the director once again for this movie. This was the third movie in a row that I have watched that he directed and it is also the third movie studio to release the movie. First it was Brain Damage films, then Lion's Gate, and now Troma steps up to the plate. At least Joe Castro was finding work. I will give him credit for that. The style in which Legend Of The Chupacabra was filmed was interesting at least. A couple of other reviews liked this movie over Blair Witch Project because things were actually happening. In other words, they didn't have to use their imagination. The thing that surprised me the most is that two men are supposed to be filming everything that is happening. That is fine with me but I didn't notice the camera drifting or moving around a whole lot. It happened at times but for the most part it didn't have the feel of people being chased by a creature.

People that claim to have seen a chupacabra often describe it as a small creature. The chupacabra in this movie is about the size of a human. I understand why they did this. I'm sure it was easier to make a suit for someone to get into then it was to make a small creature that would have to be controled by people or have to deal with motors. Even though I understand the reasons behind the move to make it much bigger than it actually is, it was still annoying. I didn't hate Legend Of The Chupacabra but I didn't enjoy it well enough to like it either. The worst offense to me was that in the scene selection menu, one is titled "The most realistic autopsy ever." The autopsy was nothing more than talking about the different features on the creature and removing one of its eyes. Then they decide to cut it open to see what it looks like on the inside. Smart move I guess since they will want to see how it ticks. The problem is though, once they cut it open, they just reach in and start pulling out its guts. You can't learn much doing it that way folks.
2 out of 5 No goats were harmed durring the writing of this review

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Druged Up Jackhammer

I sit here not really knowing what to say. The movie I watched today, The Jackhammer Massacre (2004), was directed by the same person that directed Terror Toons. I wasn't sure what to think about this. Once I put the movie in, I discovered that it was released by Lion's Gate instead of Brain Damage Films. Lion's Gate likes to gamble when it comes to horror movies. A lot of what they release is stuff that I have enjoyed. Not everything mind you, just most of it. As I was watching the credits, I noticed that Joe Castro wrote, directed, produced and did the special effects for this movie. From what I have been reading, Joe Castro does have a background for special effects. That is great but it worries me when one person takes on so much. I was interested in the movie because of the title. I can't see a jackhammer being a very good murder weapon. Is there really a massacre involving a jackhammer? Can it really be that simple?

The Jackhammer Massacre starts in present day with Jack (Aaron Gaffey) being awakened by his drug dealer looking for some money that Jack owes him. Since Jack doesn't have the money, the dealer shoots him up with some other drug that he thinks will cause Jack to OD. Instead, it causes Jack to go crazy and start killing people with a jackhammer that is near by. Before the killings get into full swing though, we flash back to one year earlier. We discover that Jack was a regular guy with a nice job and a fancy car. He meets up with his long time buddy Mike (Kyle Yaskin) who talks him into doing a drug that is a little more heavy than what Jack is used to. Mike starts to OD and Jack calls for help but leaves his buddy behind. Once back home, he finds a couple of messages waiting for him. One is from his boss saying she isn't to pleased that he has been leaving work early and the other is from a police officer.

From there we get the message of one year later. We discover that Jack is now a junkie, works as a night secrity guard for some warehouse and is basicly homeless. He is doing whatever he can to try and score some drugs for himself. He has a big spot on his arm where it has been infected from injecting drugs into it. Could things get worse? Well yes they can. His dealer injects him with some other drug that just makes him go over the top. Mike starts talking to him in a ghostly voice, urging him on to kill anyone that shows up. The boss shows up and he tells Jack that he sold the place so Jack has to clear out before the new owner shows up. With Mike urging him on and with Jack getting more and more paraniod, you can guess what is about to happen.

The effects were just ok to me. A lot of the killings happened off camera. Jack runs up to someone, we see the jackhammer make contact with said someone and then we see a close up of the person's face. Some other reviews praised The Jackhammer Massacre for being so gory and bloody. I didn't see it that way. Once in a while we would see what the jackhammer is doing to someone. These are just fleeting shots though and probably for good reason. One shot is of the jackhammer going through the shoulder area and it just didn't look right to me for some reason. I could have paused it to get a better look but I didn't care that much. The blood, at times, reminded me of koolaid. The acting wasn't too bad. Not everyone was good but the main actor, Aaron Gaffey, was good and believable. You will also find, Nadia Angelini, Trudy Kofahl, Jill Moore, Bart Burson and Evan Owen.

As a drug movie, The Jackhammer Massacre clicked well. Some people complained about the first hour or so of the movie because it mostly dealt with Jack and him being a junkie. I was hoping we would get to know Jack a little better than we end up doing, but the effort was there at least. Joe Castro does give us some nice drug images. I have never done drugs so I can't say if this was all done in a realistic way but I did find it interesting. He provides us with a few scenes where we get to see what Jack is seeing. Maybe I should say what it is that is going through Jack's mind. Some of the images are creepy like the guy that has syringes for teeth.

The movie falls apart though once it tries to become a slasher flick. Jack rarely leaves the warehouse. Everyone he kills is at the warehouse because everyone seems to come to him. His boss, the new owner, the people that come in for the new owner to figure out what the inventory is. All these, and more, show up to help Jack up the body count. Joe Castro never gives us a feel of how big this warehouse is. We never get a good look of the outside of it. At first we only see a couple of the rooms inside that gives the impression that it isn't that big of a place. As the movie goes on though, it felt like they would add more rooms just to fit the script as needed. No one ever sees Jack until it is too late which leads to another problem. The jackhammer is powered by electricty. We see Jack plug into an extension cord which appears to be the longest cord ever. Only once, when he gets up on the roof of the building, does it ever unplug. Because of this, and the weapon itself, it just gets a bit silly and takes away from the movie. I liked The Jackhammer Massacre to a point but I didn't like it that well. Might be worth a watch once but I don't plan on watching it again any time soon.
2 out of 5 Finding more reasons to stay off drugs

Monday, July 23, 2007

Death To Cartoon's

When I got today's film, I have to admit I was worried about it. Terror Toons (2002) sounds like an intersting idea but I had a feeling that because it is a low budget movie, it was going to go south pretty quick. Some people have said that they like the low budget stuff because the ideas in them can be more original. I don't know if I agree with that but I have noticed that some low budget movies try to take on something that would be much better to do if they actually had some money to put into the film. The fact that Terror Toons was shot over 3 days made me nervous as well. Once I put the movie in to the dvd player, I found out this is another movie by Brain Damaged films. In case you forgot, they put out a lot of the films I reviewed durring my month (actually longer than a month but who is counting?) long string of bad films.

Terror Toons starts with Candy (Lizzy Borden) getting a dvd in the mail called Terror Toons. It says on the cover that it features a new kind of animation. Her parents (Jack Roberts and Shimmy Maxx) tell Candy that they are leaving for a wedding and won't be home until tomorrow. They don't want her or her sister Cindy (Beverly Lynn) to have anyone over while they are gone. Of course Cindy and her friend Amy (Kerry Liu) have other plans. The eventually invite Rick (Brandon Ellison) and his buddy Eddie (Fernando Padilla) over to Cindy's house. The guys want to play strip poker and the girls want to play around with the ouija board since it is Friday the 13th. Instead, they play strip ouija. They will let the ouija board decide who and what gets striped.

Meanwhile, Candy is in her room watching her new dvd. The cartoon is, which looks more like live action with some animation thrown in, about Dr. Carnage (Matt Falletta) and his sidekick gone wrong Max Assassin (Scott Barrows). The story goes that Dr. Carnage was told by his master, Satan, that he needed somebody to help him kill people, so he sets about that and made Max. But Max was the type that wanted to go solo so the good Dr. was then trying to kill Max. It then goes on to show them killing two women and a cop in their cartoon world before they manage to come to our world. Once they are in our world, they seem to work together rather well.

The effects were simply ok for this movie. The cartoon effects would sometimes look kind of cool while at other times they just looked bad. The same goes for the horror effects. I liked some of it and while none of it was real bad, some of it I just couldn't figure out why it didn't look right to me. There was one scene where the skull of one person was pulled out that I thought was really cool looking effect. Not all was bad about Terror Toons, just most of it. The acting is really bad. One scene requires the four to stand and start laughing at Dr. Carnage and Maxx. Should be a simple task right? Everyone can laugh. Not these people it would seem like. They had the worst fake laughs I think I have yet to watch.

A movie that is shot over 3 days. I don't know how long it normaly takes but you honestly can't tell me that you can film a movie in 3 days and expect the end result to be good. Maybe they were going for "it's so bad it's good." I thought maybe they would be on to something here. I knew I shouldn't expect too much for effects since a movie like this really doesn't have the money to put in what I would consider a good animation movie. If you are wondering, the two cartoon characters are just people dressed up in what could pass as halloween costumes.

Speaking of characters. Terror Toons gives us a weird set of them. Candy can't seem to act like the 20 something she is. Instead, she seems more like a 10 year old. The others act like teenagers even they they look older than what Candy does. I guess I wanted to like this movie. The idea of people dying for real but in cartoon ways sounds like it could be really interesting if done right. Their idea of cartoon ways was really with over sized weapons. Very large saw, large gun, large surgen's knife...things like that. Nothing that really reminds me of a cartoon. I have seen large mallets at times but that is about it. A small few found Terror Toons to be funny. Those that did said it set out to be funny. The mom in the film is obviously a guy so maybe they were trying to be funny at times. For most of us though, me included, it was just plain stupid. I'm giving it the rating I am because I feel like it could have been a good movie. At least a fun movie but without the money to make it and a very fast shoot, it missed by a mile.
2 out of 5 Maybe they should have hired Roger Rabbit

Saturday, July 21, 2007

American J-Horror

I watched The Messengers (2006) Thursday night because I wasn't sure how long my interview with Terry Kimmel was going to take. So, I thought I would go ahead and do another review. I was in the mood to watch another movie and The Messengers is one I had been wanting to watch for some time now. I wanted to go see it on the big screen but it had a short run here so I didn't get to see it. In fact, I'm not even sure I knew it was out yet before I found out it had already been pulled. Then it was showing at the cheap theater so I decided to go there to watch it sometime. The problem I had there is, I went to see a different, non-horror movie (yes, I do watch other kinds of movies) there and the place was pretty run down. After that I decided that even though the movies were only $1, I didn't want to go back there. I felt like I needed to look over my shoulder more than watch the movie. After I watched it on dvd, safely in my own home, I got on here to start typing up a review. I had uploaded the poster and then, for whatever reason, I decided to check my email. There it was, the approved interview. So my mind shifted gears once again. So here it is, at long last, the review for The Messengers.

It starts off in black and white which I thought was a nice touch. A woman and her son are being attacked by something, or someone, that we never see. After that little opening, we move to present day. Driving to their new home is Roy (Dylan McDermott), his wife Denise (Penelope Ann Miller), his daughter Jess (Kristen Stewart) and his son Ben (Evan and Theodore Turner). They are a down on their luck family. Jess is a troubled teen of sorts. We don't find out until much later in the film just what kind of trouble she has been in. We just know it has really set the family at odds with one another.

Roy is putting everything he has into the house and land that he just bought. He turns down and offer from someone else that wants the land. The offer would give him his money back plus some but he believes this move will help bring his family back to where they were before the troubles started so he turns it down. On a side note, the man that makes the offer is William B. Davis. If you ever watched him on the show X-Files you should know that he hasn't changed at all. Looks older but still wearing the same suit I think. Roy is going into the sunflower seed business. I can't remember anyone in a film doing that so good job at finding something original. Ben starts to see things almost as soon as they get to their new home. Jess hears things once in a while and will catch a glimpse of something. It is obviously a ghost but it is unclear what it wants just yet. There is a mystery here and only Jess can figure it out since her parents don't trust her and don't believe her.

The Messengers is rated PG-13 so I wasn't expecting a gore fest. Another reason I wasn't expecting that is because this is a ghost story with a bit of a twist at the end. There is some blood but not a whole lot of it. What is there was needed to make the movie feel real. Most all the effects for the ghosts are done CGI style. How they do it though makes it stand out. The bed sheets are pulled up and you can see legs below the sheet only. It was a nice effect and you will find things like that all through the film. I was impressed by the CGI but the problem is, if you have watched any J-horror type films, you won't see anything new here. Some of the movements and the way the ghosts look will remind you a lot of a J-horror movie. There is a reason for that, the directors are from Japan.

The acting was something I really enjoyed. I remembered Penelope Ann Miller from The Relic. I haven't watched her in another horror movie until now or any other movie, that I can remember anyways. She looks the same, just older which she should since The Relic is now 10 years old. I guess she was my least favorite from this cast though. Kristen Stewart surprised me a great deal. I will be checking out some of her other movies when I can. John Corbett can also be found here. He plays a guy that happens to be passing through at the right time and gets hired by Roy to help out on the farm.

The Messengers has a good story behind it. It kept me guessing and, unlike some really smart people out there, I didn't guess the twist. It made me jump a couple if times but I'm not sure if that was because of what happened in the movie or because the was a sudden blast of sound. Unless it has to do with something in the movie making a noise, I really wish they would stop using loud noises to try and scare me. It can work but I would hope they would want the images themselves to scare people, not a loud noise. One movie "critic" (I say that because they want to think they are better than us internet people since they get paid) said, "The grown-ups fare worse: They speak . . . very . . . slowly . . . as if to pad the running time out," Ty Burr from the Boston Globe. They do do that and I think I know why. It wasn't to pad the running time in case you are wondering. There was a lot of tension between parents and daughter so I think they were speaking as slow as they did to give the appearance that they are simply picking their words and not trying to cause another fight to break out at any moment.

The reviews on Netflix and other places are mostly on the good side. The ones that seem to have hated it do so because they found it unoriginal. You will find a lot of crows in The Messengers. Because of this, a lot of people, including myself, thought of the movie The Birds. Maybe they were giving that movie a nod but I honestly think they were using the crows in a more traditional way. According to superstition, crows are harbingers of death and disaster. Personaly, I think that is what the writer was using the crows for. It makes sense to me.

There were a few minor things that I didn't like about The Messengers, like that Roy would offer a total stranger to live with them on their first meeting. Over all though, I enjoyed this movie a lot. It had a great story with a nice twist to it. It kept me guessing as to what was going on. I also liked that Ben, who I placed around 2 or 3 years old, could see the ghosts more. If you have studied about ghosts at all, it is said that the younger the person, the more open their minds are to things like ghosts so it is more likely they will see them. You can tell they used that here. Ben can see them all the time, Jess some of the time, the parents not at all. If you like these types of movies, you can't go wrong with this one.
4 out of 5 Keeping crows away from me

Friday, July 20, 2007

Interview: Terry Kimmel

If you read my last post, the review of Prison Of The Psychotic Damned, you will have noticed that I said something about it being the first post in a possible series. I don't know for sure how many there will be yet, this could be the only one actually. One of the people that leaves me comments to read is Cattleworks. I have gotten to know him since he first showed up here and he has been telling me about POTPD simply because he was proud of it. He worked behind the scenes and even has a small part in the movie so he does have good reasons to be proud of it. One thing I have never done before is interview someone. Since Cattleworks is someone I consider a friend, I thought I would see if he would be willing to let me try and interview him. I thought it would be fun to do and it would be something different for my blog. If this works, I will try and do this more often if I can. I present to you, Terry Kimmel.





Heather Santrous: Terry, I really appreciate you taking the time to talk to me and being brave enough to be the first person for me to sharpen my interview skills on. I take it since I see your comments on my own blog, and other horror related blogs, that you are a fan of horror movies. Do you roughly remember when you started watching horror movies and was there a certain movie that got you hooked on the genre?

Terry Kimmel: Oh, man, I wish I had a definitive answer to that! Not just for you but for myself, because I'd be curious to know. Whatever. I guess I just like horror movies.

One of my first film memories was a fantasy film. It was at the now long gone Sheridan Twin Drive-in, and we came in a little late to see One Million Years B.C. featuring the "Dynamation" stop-motion effects of Ray Harryhausen and the fur-bikini-clad wonders of Raquel Welch. Um, not necessarily in that order. We came in when Raquel's tribe of fish-eating cave people were fighting a giant-ass sea tortoise. Hmmm, maybe this film doesn't really count as fantasy, but is technically an action/historical drama.

Ha ha ha ha! Sorry. I think I've always been fond of fantasy films, so the genres of fantasy, horror and sci-fi all were appealing to me. But perhaps dinosaurs and gorgeous women hooked me from the start, which would put me at 7 years old then. Cripes!

I also remember arriving late to the drive-in to see the original Planet Of The Apes. We came in when the crew of the spaceship discovers that the lone woman on board died of old age in the suspended animation tube she was sleeping in because of an air leak or whatever.

I also wonder if my parents chose the movies we watched as a family because they were interested in them or because I showed some interest in them. So, even though I don't have any distinct memories of this either way, I wonder if they influenced my tastes in film.

Much, much more recently, I read Cathal Tohill and Pete Tombs' book, IMMORAL TALES: EUROPEAN SEX & HORROR MOVIES 1956-1984. This turned me on to tracking down all sorts of trashy, lurid horror fare on DVD. Titles like The Blood Spattered Bride and filmmakers like Jean Rollin and Jess Franco. Which also led me to checking out a couple of DVD companies that distribute these weird films from the past, like Redemption and Mondo Macabro, which helped me to discover films like Nude For Satan (with awesome Italian actress Rita Calderoni!) and Alucarda. Oh, yeah... I've been in a complete moral and spiritual downward spiral ever since I crossed paths with that damn book...

There's also another component to this question, too, I think. And that's my desire to make movies. Because of this, I always find horror films interesting intellectually, because I think they offer an opportunity for the filmmaker to see how well they can manipulate an audience, to see if they can elicit a strong reaction from viewers simply by having them watch their movie. The horror genre offers different degrees of scary films, too, from ultra-gorey to bloodless psychological terror and everything in-between. So there's a lot of cool potential to explore in terms of experimenting with ways to frighten and make an impact on an audience. As an example, the films of Alfred Hitchcock always symbolized to me the intellectual aspect of trying to generate suspense and terror in an audience. So sometimes I watch scary films as an audience member and sometimes as a student/wanna-be filmmaker.

HS: I have a hard time saying which movie is my favorite since there are so many movies that could fit that bill for me. Are you like that as well or is there a movie that you do call your favorite?

TK: Oh, I'm definitely the same way. My usual answer for my favorite movie is one of two titles: It's A Wonderful Life and Pulp Fiction. So, I'm cheating from the git-go.

In terms of horror films, my usual answer is this: Scariest horror film is The Exorcist. Most disturbing horror film is Tobe Hooper's The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Jaws I love to death, but I think I love that movie as a movie, not a horror movie, although it's overt horror elements work extremely well. But yeah, I could sub-category you to death (or at least to levels of extreme boredom) with favorite movies and favorite horror movies.

HS: I am a big fan of horror movies, and movies in general. But I have never had a desire to be an actress or even work behind the scenes. When did you first feel that desire?

TK: I don't remember when I first was interested in doing plays in school. I think I first did some performing in middle school (grades 6-8), but I don't remember why I was attracted to it. I think performing came out of my usual desire to participate in a group activity. I'm one of those jerks in class that always likes to ask questions or always volunteers to read aloud. So, if they were looking for volunteers to participate in plays, that's probably the biggest reason why I auditioned in the first place. So, that's just something that's been a part of me, to some degree, for a while. Either performing, or else, helping in other ways to put on a production, like set construction.

Meanwhile, my best friend, Steve D'Addieco, was also interested in plays and movies. His family got a super-8 film camera when he was in high school, and he quickly started making short movies with it. The thing is with movies, you need actors, so you drag your friends into these crazy films. That dynamic continues with these ultra low-budget films today. If you're interested in making movies, but you have no money, you try to establish some networking and creative community karma by helping out on other people's films in some way. Hopefully, they'll return the favor when you need to exploit them-- uh, use them for your own film.

For some reason, the Buffalo area is a fertile location for creative individuals. There has been a network/community of live theater operating in the area for years, despite having the valid reputation of an economically struggling blue-collar town. I'm very fortunate to have gone to high school with Randy Kramer, who is the artistic director for Musicalfare, a theater company he started years ago that focuses on only staging musical productions. His wife, Lisa Ludwig, is one of the busier actresses in town, and I've been fortunate to work with her on several occasions, having co-produced plays with her and having directed her in a number of these productions some years ago. I'm also the godfather of Randy and Lisa's son, and I used to babysit their daughter, who made me act in all her little weird dramas. Like, I played Beast to her Belle and apparently I wasn't doing right by Belle in the relationship, etc., etc. Hey, I didn't make this stuff up, the kid did.

So, personal and creative relationships overlap a lot here in town. A lot of my friends work as actors or directors or set designers or lighting designers in local theater and I've worked with them in several productions over the years. Now that video technology has advanced to such an incredible degree over the last several years, all that theater experience I have now wants to translate itself into cinematic experience. So, all these factors and circumstances contribute to my interest and desire to participate in the making of and the creation of my own movies, horror or otherwise. So part of my answer I guess is personal interest, part of it is wanting to help out, and part of it is fortunate circumstance. Uh, did that answer your question?

HS: Yes I believe it did answer the question in a long way. You have said you like to talk and it does show but that is just fine with me. It is nice to know men can keep up with us women. Seriously though, take as long as you need for the answers, I'm not going anywhere. I know you have talked about it on your own blog, but some of my readers may not have been on your blog before. So would you mind explaining how you ended up working on Prison Of The Psychotic Damned, and your various roles with it?

TG: My involvement with POTPD was a total networking situation. My friend Emil Nowak owns the oldest running comic book store in Buffalo, the Queen City Book Store. Well, it was his family’s store when I first met him years ago and I guess he’s inherited the place outright over the years. But I met him first as a comic book geek shopping at his store. Our relationship was always of an acquaintance type nature at first, since I really went to his store irregularly, like once, maybe twice a year. But being a good businessman, Emil always remembered me and we’d always chat for a bit. That’s how he gradually learned that I was interested in drawing comics and how I was also involved in local theater.

Now, with home video technology advanced to the degree it has so far, Emil started exploring making his own films a few years ago. He still owns Queen City Book Store. But he also has other creative aspirations. One day a few years ago, I came into the store and he started talking about his involvement with video cameras and how he was working on a short film called Tesla The Accumulator, a fantasy “bio-pic” of inventor Nikolai Tesla. It was also based on an original comic book he had written, inked and self-published called THE ACCUMULATOR. He had just invested in a Panasonic video camera that apparently was capable of shooting an image that was capable of being blown up to 35mm film size. Maybe I’m saying that wrong. I am not a tech geek, so I probably just made myself sound really stupid. But my understanding is this: video shot on this camera was capable of being blown up to 35mm film size and then projected in a theater.

Emil was interested in making films that were eventually going to be seen by an actual audience in an actual theater, so that’s why he invested the money in the camera. Because he knew I was involved with local theater for awhile, he asked me if I wanted to help him out with making some miniature sets for Tesla. I said sure. He was using the basement of his house as a sort of mini-studio and that’s where we worked. Well, I wound up helping out in a variety of ways on the film. Some set work, then being an extra hand helping out with sound and lights, and then doing some odd performance things as well, too.

I briefly did a sword combat scene with the Tesla character (on the Tesla website there’s a picture of me wearing a mask and cape and it’s from this scene). I also played a strange, masked “dream creature” doing funky improv modern dance “movements” in a cloud of fog. For lack of a better word, I use the phrase “modern dance” because Lord knows, I am not a dancer. I was just flailing my body around and I guess Emil thought it was okay.

Because of my involvement on Tesla, Emil mentioned to me another project he found himself getting involved with. This was the summer of 2005. Emil had been asked to be the Director of Photography (DP) on a low budget horror film that was to be shot on digital video (DV). A gentleman named David Williams, who had just started a new magazine called Red Scream, a magazine devoted to “erotic horror,” was also trying to make some horror films under the banner of Red Scream Films. They were going to shoot in the same prison that The Shawshank Redenption was filmed, located in Ohio .

It was going to be a 10 day shoot. Would I be interested in coming along and being part of Emil’s crew? Well, the opportunity sounded great, but I knew that my wife, a teacher and writer, who is generally very supportive of me in terms of my own creative pursuits, would nonetheless never go for me being out of town for 10 days, so I had to pass. Well, some time passed and shooting in Ohio turned out to be too impractical for a number of reasons.

But then David W. found out about the availability of Buffalo ’s own historic Central Terminal building, either on his own or through Emil’s suggestion, I forget which. When the location shifted to Buffalo, my working on the film became an actual possibility, because I could always come home every day (or night) after shooting. I wound up doing seven days of the shoot as one of two full-time “production assistants.” The other PA was Mike Carrigan, who also played some of the dead characters in the film (like the Administrator). We basically were the technical support crew for the DP, a talented man from out of town named Matthias Saunders, helping setting up lights, etc. We also did some set work as well, supervised by Emil. Matthias wound up being named as the main DP because he had more film experience, but Emil is still credited as co-DP because they did have two cameras on the shoot, Emil’s Panasonic and another rented Panasonic.

Prior to actual shooting, Mike and I worked on the doll room set that becomes an important scene for Aurora (actress Demona Bast). We had fun abusing all these poor doll heads and doll parts and I think the scene looks pretty cool visually between Emil’s set design, our artistically destructive efforts and the lighting.

The Terminal is currently being maintained mostly by a charitable organization whose main focus is to make sure the building doesn’t fall into further disrepair before, hopefully, someone with deep pockets comes to the Terminal’s rescue financially. Because of that, the electricity in the building is limited, so we had to use plenty of extension cords to access where the power was available. We had a limited number of lights, so we generally set up only one scene at a time. When we were done with a scene, director D.W. (David) Kann and the cast would move on to the next location. One of us (me or Mike) would hang back and strike the lights and move them to the next location, while the other guy went ahead to hear the next set-up instructions. There were some occasions when we wrapped a scene in one of the dark rooms at night, and I had to strike the lights by myself.

I’d have to concentrate and not let my imagination get away from me, as I shut off each light, and the room, of course, would get darker, bit by bit. When the wind blows in the Terminal, it makes some weird noises with all the broken windows and the cavernous spaces. When I’d get down to disconnecting the last light, I’d prepare myself to be plunged into darkness by saying to myself, “It’s only a movie, it’s only a movie,” and then unplug the last light with only my puny flashlight left for illumination. Those were fun exercises in panic management.

Mostly though, Mike and I were extra hands helping out on the movie. So, for instance, when the “Orb,” the malevolent ball of light that hunts down the various investigators in the film, is trying to bust in this door that two of the actresses are trying to keep shut, it’s either me or Mike or both, pounding as hard as possible on the “Orb” side of the door, hopefully making the action seem more believable. We had another cool filmmaking moment when we were shooting Noel Francomano’s scene, when she, as the character Nessie, is busy freaking out and racing down this dark, dust and debris-filled hallway. David Kann wanted a shot of her from behind, with the camera chasing after her down the hall and then another shot of her running towards the camera, the camera running ahead of her, essentially going backwards.

Running after Noel was easy enough. There was Matthias on camera, David K. following him, Eugene the sound assistant on boom mike, and then me trailing all three of them, chasing after Noel, because I was hanging onto the extension cord(s) we needed for the light and dragging it behind us. The real trick was when we had to run backwards away from Noel running toward us.

Way at the end of the hallway we had as many people as we could to gather up the extension cord as we ran to them. That way we wouldn’t trip over the gathering slack of the cord. We had a few people holding onto the cord behind the main three, with me leading the way. We held on firmly so the people taking up the slack wouldn’t accidentally get ahead of us and actually yank the equipment by mistake. This also kept the cord from tangling in Matthias’, David’s and Eugene’s feet as they all ran backwards.

The first take of this went awesome. It went very smoothly, and it was very exhilarating. C’mon! How could it not be! You have a girl screaming her brains out, racing frantically down a dark, dismal scary hallway, while a small network of people are working in the dark just as frantically like energetic moles to make this scene work technically. David decided to do one more take for insurance coverage, understandably.

We set up again. And then, we were off. As I got to the end of the hall, I remember seeing like two or three people running off carrying slack extension cord, with another bunch of coils of it waiting on the floor to be carried off as well. As I turned to see the others arrive down the hall, I witnessed the main three tumbling, stumbling all into each other and landing in a dusty, probably asbestos-y, pile in front of me. As the three dusty dudes later recounted, Eugene’s mike boom accidentally struck the fragile ceiling while they were running, dislodging a bunch of ceiling debris, which tumbled to the ground in front of Noel as she ran.

Without hesitation, the screaming redhead cleared the falling crap like a skilled hurdler, but Eugene’s balance was thrown off and as he tried to compensate, he kind of crashed into the other two, resulting in the pile-up. But Matthias protected the camera when he fell, and he said he caught the whole spectacle on video. I’ve yet to see it, though. That was a fun moment. So basically, Mike and I were the technical crew guys and were also utilized as extra hands when needed.

In the movie we watch Melantha Blackthorne cut her arm and then start to move/dance around the room she is in. Suddenly the door opens. An orderly pops his head in and then rushes in quickly followed by another orderly. That first orderly is Mr. Kimmel himself.

HS: How did you manage to get on screen?

TK: Well, when you see us rush Melantha in the room, the actual shot of us in the room and physically taking her, that was our first day of shooting. They were only shooting us (the orderlies) from behind and they only needed a couple guys in orderly costumes to get the job done quickly. So, Mike and I were available and we were just plugged in. Both Mike and myself are both hams and were willing to do whatever (usually), so it really wasn’t that big a deal.

The shot of us busting through the door was actually shot near the end of the shoot, when we were shooting the Orb scenes with Susie and Demona trapped in the little room. After that Orb sequence was done, they just needed an insert shot of the orderlies busting in the “hotel room door.” So we used the same door the Orb was trying to bust through, shooting it at a different, tight angle. We put our costumes on and Matthias and David K. waited in the room and yelled "action". I improvised a little by pausing as soon as we busted in the door, so that there was a moment you could actually see my face, otherwise if we just tore past the camera, we'd both be a blur. I just did it and waited to see if David minded. After the first take, he and Matthias both cracked up because I had stopped to do a “take,” but they thought it was fine, so all the following takes we did the same way, stopping briefly after entering the room, and then we continued on quickly. There were also takes where we tried some dialogue, like, we’d bust in, stop, improvise something, like yell, “You bitch!” and then continue on to supposedly tackle Melantha and hustle her away. But, mostly, Mike and I were available bodies.

HS: Did you get nervous at all before hand?

TK: No, it was fun and I didn’t have dialogue. I was mostly nervous about my knowledge of technical stuff, which I really have a very limited amount of. Mike actually went to school for this. I’m just a guy with accumulated experience, enough to get me into trouble, I guess. But the performance thing was no big deal. Of course, if I had dialogue to memorize, that would’ve been different. When I did a short monologue as Ed Sullivan in a production of BYE, BYE BIRDIE years ago at Artpark in front of a live audience of several hundred people, that was more nerve wracking because I start the scene alone on stage. But that was fun, too.

On a related note, that whole hotel room sequence is shot in a room that doesn’t exist. It was shot in an empty space in the terminal that Emil dressed up to look like a hotel room, with lots of cluttered props and set pieces, a window frame and a curtain disguising a larger Terminal window in a crumbling wall, plus judicious shooting of the dressed area, so that you imagine the rest of the room. The doorway we enter as orderlies is in another area of the Terminal entirely (not to mention a week later). The exterior shot of the hotel was actually shot in Los Angeles by someone David K. knew.

Melantha’s bathroom sequence is actually an old tub placed in the room where the bloody operation scene takes place. There’s no actual working plumbing connected to it. There’s no actual water in the tub, it’s reflected light on a pan of water. So the whole hotel room sequence was an illusion of smart editing and audience imagination, which is very cool, especially in these days of CGI where you see everything.

HS: Is there a chance we will see you in another movie? Maybe even one where you get to say something?

TK: Oh, heck, yes! I’m afraid so! The last few months Emil’s been directing a script of his for a horror film called Banshee, which is being produced by him for his film company Buffalo Nickel Productions and with the additional cooperation of Mike Bohatch’s Nightmare Kinetics (Mike B. did the opening credit sequence for POTPD).

I play a creature in Banshee (no dialogue but I get to make animal noises and eat people). I also appear in some very small roles throughout. So, no real dialogue yet, but more screen time. The last major scenes for the film are being shot this weekend actually (July 21-22) and then the film will be in post production with just a handful of other shots to be done. Melantha Blackthorne makes an appearance in this film, too, but in a supporting role.

And Emil and Mike B. have other horror film plans in the works. Plus, David Williams continues to make movies through Red Scream Films. Hell, Troma Entertainment actually came to Buffalo to shoot Poultrygeist recently! So, I’m sure I’ll be appearing somehow in some capacity in somebody’s film.

HS: I noticed something in the scene where you were pretending to be a ball of light. I expected the Orb would have been able to pass through the door and not bang on it. I assume there was some movie magic going on there so we couldn't see you. Do you know how that was done?

TK: Well, when we were pretending to be the Orb, specifically I meant Mike and I were trying to get through the door that Susie and Demona were struggling to keep shut. David K. figured it was easier for them to act terrified that something was trying to get into the room if something was actually trying to get into the room! The close-up of the Orb itself, when it looks like the Slime Guy from Ghostbusters, floating in the hallway, turning the corner, and then, more malevolently in close-up with the different tortured spirits in it as the Orb flies towards us. That was all optical effects done by a company that David K. had worked with before.

But the scenes where you see the actors running away from the light, that’s just a spotlight chasing them from behind, mostly balanced on the top of a step-ladder. It’s a ridiculously simple effect but I think it’s very effective in context. When we pound on the door, we’re just out of camera sight and then the light floods the door behind us, so that’s just pounding and yelling and a lot of light. When Melantha’s in the bathroom, hiding from the light, I was holding a spotlight by hand and acting like it was searching for her through the various cracks in the wall. That was one of the few times we tried to “act” with the lightsource, like it was a dog sniffing around for the characters instead of merely chasing people. But the actual special effects shots were done elsewhere.

HS: One last question, what do you see in the future for Terry Kimmel?

TK: Well, if my personal experience tells me anything, I’ll be making lots of plans for things and starting lots of projects. But I have a hideous track record in terms of actually finishing anything I start. Which is why it’s good that I’m working on other people’s projects, because they seem to finish their stuff.

But seriously, I’m working on a screenplay right now, really my first one, and I’m just trying to see if I can tell a story in the screenplay format. Having said that, the screenplay, when finished (he said optimistically) may be too involved, or, well, too racy for me to be able to shoot as written. Although, I have been thinking of possible ways to film it, at least hypothetically. If I actually finish this screenplay, I plan on fine-tuning it in a second draft, and then I’ll probably start another screenplay, something I’m calling BLIND DATE WITH THE BEAST. The one I’m writing now had a great title to start with, if I do say so myself, but the plot and characters have started to change directions on me while I’ve been writing it. So the title doesn’t actually work anymore! But, if I don’t use it, I’ll save it for another plot. Both ideas are in the horror genre, although the first one seems more exploitation/thriller to my thinking.

I also have dreams of writing and drawing a comic book as well. I’m also working on a series of short stories about four high school girls that I’m hoping to pull together into a novel for young adults, I guess. Perhaps there’s a reason why I never finish anything! I keep distracting myself by starting too many projects at the same time!

But of my many plans, I hope to someday write and direct a horror film that will be reviewed in the various horror blogs I read, like Final Girl, And Now the Screaming Starts, Gore-Gore Girl and of course, lovely Heather Santrous’ Mermaid Heather… I'd like to see if I can rate a 4 or 5 out of 5 “Scary as hell because he actually finished what he started!”

HS: I really hope I will get to do that someday Terry. As I said before, I really appreciate you doing this interview with me. I had a lot of fun and I hope you did as well. I will get this posted on Mermaid Heather here soon and I will see you there!

TK: I had a blast doing this and I thank you, humbly, for the opportunity.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Haunted Stations

I'm sorry for the slight delay in getting a new review up. I was going to get this review up over the weekend but as it turned out, I had a very busy weekend. Not that it is a bad thing. I had a good weekend that involved a lot of fun, a lot of time on the road and very little sleep. So Monday was my rest up from vacation day and I finaly sat down last night to watch Prison Of The Psychotic Damned (2006). This will be the first in a series of posts that center around this movie. There will be at least one other post, maybe more if things work out in my favor. I don't want to spoil the surprise so just check back here. I will hopefully have the other post up soon enough. It is still being worked on so I'm not sure how long it will be just yet. For now though, sit back and enjoy the review.

Prison Of The Psychotic Damned is about five people who go into the Grand Centeral Terminal, a building that has long been abandoned in Buffalo. Ryan Bloom (Susan Adriensen) has written books and made a documentary or two about a few other locations. She is leading this group of people to explore the terminal and to try and find out if the place is actually haunted or not. Following her is her sidekick and tech expert Jason (Jim Vaughn). Aurora (Demona Bast) who can pick up on feelings and can sometimes catch an image of something that happened in the past. Nessie (Noel Francomano) who is just there I guess. Nessie is kind of the quiet one but once she gets going she is almost bouncing off the walls. And last, but hardly least, is Kansas (Melantha Blackthorne) who is just along for the ride because she has to do things once in a while so her dad doesn't cut off her funding. As they drive there and explore the building, Ryan (or Rayna) fills them in on the history of the place. Once the spirits make themselves known to the explorers, our little group finds a lot more than they were ever expecting.

Since Prison Of The Psychotic Damned is an independent film, I wasn't really expecting much as far as effects go. I was in for a surprise though. The makeup effects were very well done. The ghosts in flash backs were fun to see and even the ghosts/zombies that we see in present day had some very cool makeup effects to them. Some of the deaths did get pretty gory at times. One of the ladies gouges out her eyes. One person happens on some of the doctors that used to work there many years ago that like to do some cutting and that they did. This was the only effect I felt could have been done a little better. Some of his insides get pulled out and it was rather easy to guess what they were using for that effect. Still, it was nicely done. As far as the acting goes, I didn't have a problem with the way things were acted out but I did have a problem with the characters which I will get into more a little further on.

The key for a movie like this is its location. It is hard to have a creepy movie when everything looks very nice and bright. The Buffalo Centeral Terminal is an actual place and director David Kann does a wonderful job of showing us how the building looks now and giving us an idea of just how big the place is. The building itself is a character of its own. The lighting actually worked in the movie's favor as it always felt dark inside and you never knew if something might happen at any moment. To me, Prison Of The Psychotic Damned never felt like a low budget movie. The angles were always being changed up, the camera was on the move a lot and the quality of the film was better than most. I liked David Kann's style and I am looking forward to seeing more movies from him.

Now for what I didn't like. I had a hard time relating to the different characters in the film. We get to know Kansas the most and Ryan some as well. There are a couple of scenes where these two interact. For me, these were the only scenes that felt fairly normal to me. It seemed like all other interactions with the characters would almost always end up with someone yelling and/or swearing at someone else. It is hard to like someone when they are always angry and arguing with other people. This did affect the over all feel of the movie for me but all that aside, I still thought this was a well done film. Some other reviews agree with me about the characters, some don't so I guess it is just your personal taste. I ended up watching it twice, I wanted to listen to the director's commentary and also because I was a little confused on some plot points. The second time through it made more sense to me so that may be something you will want to watch for. Over all I felt this is a movie worth checking out. You can find it on Netflix now if you have that so queue it up.
3 out of 5 Thinking I would run away if I saw ghostly surgeons waiting for me

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Wacky Sorority Girls

When I first started getting movies from Netflix, I would watch everything there was to see on the disk. Didn't matter if I was interested in seeing how they came up with the set designs, I watched it! Since then I have gotten a bit more picky. I used to watch a movie twice, sometimes more, if there was a commentary track (sometimes there is more than one, take Cabin Favor as an example with 5 commentary tracks). I have since discovered that not all commentary tracks were created equal. Now it will just depend on how well I liked the movie and/or who is doing the commentary track. I bring all of this up because Blood Sisters (1987) happens to be the rare movie that I took the time to watch twice because of the commentary track. I don't always do that now days just because it can take forever for me to mail a movie back if I take the time to watch a movie again just for the commentary track. If you think a movie could get any worse at times, try listening to a commentary track that is just as boring while watching the bad movie. I will tell you why I bothered with the commentary track a little later. For now though, the review.

Blood Sisters starts off in an odd way. This little boy and girl are standing outside of a house or something when the little girl gets mad because the boy wants to see her naughty parts. She yells that he is a pervert and says he is one because he has no dad. The little boy runs off and enters a house. From there the camera changes to a point of view camera. He wanders through the house and we discover that this isn't just a house but one for guys to find and pay for a special lady. He enters a room, at least I was assuming it was still the little boy, and now he has a shotgun. He shoots the lady and the guy she is with and the movie jumps forward to 13 years later.

Now we are at a sorority house, not the same house as the other event but that is coming. We see eight women dressed in robs, chanting and drinking something that I'm guessing is supposed to look like blood. Linda (Amy Brentano) is in charge of the initiation of the other women into the sorority. As a final test they are to go into the house from the start of the film, that has been empty for the last 13 years, for a scavenger hunt. Sounds easy right? Linda has a couple of her guy friends set all this up but they also rig the house to make it scary. Weird noises, fake spiders and assorted things like that. The house is said to be haunted by the dead prostitutes and the men that vistited them. Never mind the fact that it has only been 13 years since it closed down and only one murder was shown. Once in a while we catch someone slinking around. Who could that be?

The effects are pretty cheesy in places. No real gore to be found. Some blood when people are shot or stabbed but no major wounds shown or anything like that. Mostly the effects go to the ghostly images of the prostitutes as they go walking across the hallways. I didn't have a problem with the acting really. I felt everyone did a fairly good job with what they had to work with. When you get lines like "Eat my shorts tampon breath," it is funny but not something that can except a lot of acting from. The cast is mostly people that never made another movie or only made a few other movies. In case you are wondering who was in it though, here they are: Shannon McMahon, Dan Erickson, Marla Machart, Elizabeth Rose, Cjerste Thor, Patricia Finneran, Gretchen Kingsley, Bridgete Cossu, Randall Walden, Brain Charlton Wrye and John Fasano.

Blood Sisters is a kind of movie that it didn't know for sure what it wanted to be. There are ghost walking around and some of the sorority women have visions of what once happened in the house here and there. What makes it funny is that they always show the same women that was shown at the very start of the movie and even in a diary kept by one of these prostitutes, it only talks about one of them being killed so why is everyone a ghost a mere 13 years later? At some point in between these ghostly visions, we discover that this is also a slasher movie. A killer is roaming the house. We have no idea who it is until the big reveal at the end of the movie though. The killer has long curly hair and wears womens clothing but is it really a woman? There is a slip that can be found in this movie. After seeing the killer a moment after one of the women and her boyfriend have been shot, one of the sorority women runs and warns everyone else that is still alive. She tells them that "she" did it. After they all get outside and she has more time to explain why she is running away and this time she says that "he" killed them. I guess that could be explained away easy enough, she is in a panic after all.

The deaths are pretty lame in Blood Sisters. Writer/Director Roberta Findlay admits in her interview that is found on the dvd that the only reason she even made this film was to spend money. It seems if she didn't make another movie, after two other movies made money, the goverment would get most of the profit made so she spent it before they could do that. It shows. The first death, outside the one at the start of the movie, doesn't happen until after the 59 minute mark, with a garter belt no less. The deaths happen fairly quick from that point with only two actually getting slashed. The only reason I watched Blood Sisters twice was because Joe Bob Briggs provided a commentary track. I kind of remember when he was on TNT doing late night movies. I have come across a couple of other movies he has done commentary for and I have always found them full of facts and often times funny as well. He had me laughing pretty hard at one point in his commentary for Blood Sisters.

I can't really suggest anyone watch this movie. From the reviews on Netflix and IMDb, I don't think to many people have watched it. A confusing plot, lame killings, doesn't know if it is a haunted house or slasher movie, bad writing. It has it all really. If you like Joe Bob Briggs or if you have never heard of him and want to check out his commentary, this would be a good way to do it. He makes this bad movie fun at least.
2 out of 5 Just because of Joe Bob

Monday, July 09, 2007

Fur Balls Part Four

Late last night I watched the last movie in this series. I was going to put the review up then but I was getting tired and it does take me a while to get a review wrote up so I decided it would be on the list of things to do for today. As rain keeps falling, its not like I have anything better to do around here. From what I was reading, a Critters 5 was planed but since Critters 3 and 4 didn't do very well, it was scarped. Some claim that a box set, released over seas, has a disk that shows some of the footage that had been filmed for the 5th movie. Sounds like something they did with the Sleepaway Camp box set. I have some movies to watch before I get into the next series on my list. I'm looking forward to the next series since one of my favorite actresses is in one of the films.

Critters 4 (1991) was filmed back to back with Critters 3 so it picks up right where Critters 3 ends. At the end (don't worry, I won't give to much away) Charlie (Don Keith Opper) is waiting for a pod to load some Krite eggs into when it comes crashing into where he is at. The words "to be continued" pop up and thus it ends. As we pick up Charlie in this movie, he is loading the eggs up and the door closes before he gets out and off into space it goes. Next thing we know, its the year 2045. We meet a space salvage crew, Rick (Anders Hove) is the captain of the ship. The rest of the crew would be Fran (Angela Bassett), Al (Brad Dourif), Bernie (Eric DaRe) and Ethan (Paul Whitthorne). They come across the pod and pull it in. They discover who it belongs to and contact the company. This is the same company that supports the bounty hunters. Counselor Tetra (Terrence Mann) informs them that they will get triple of what they normaly get for salvage. All they have to do is take it to a space station.

Once at the station they discover that it appears to be empty. The computer is still working but seems a little off. The station has one of those nifty voice activated computers and can even talk back. Al seems to be the computer expert so gets to work on finding out what he can about the station. He discovers that the core of the station is critacle which might explain why it is sitting empty. They decide to stay since the Counselor is on the way to pay them for the pod. Rick end up watch Fran in the shower and she punches him a good one for his trouble. He doesn't take to that to well and decides to open the pod, even though he was ordered not to. Once he finaly gets it open, Charlie comes poping out. Rick soon discovers though that Charlie wasn't the only thing in the pod.

The effects in Critters 4 are much like they were in the third movie. Very little gore is to be found. I think they did even fewer effects for this movie then they did for the last one. That could be because they had to add effects for the sci-fi part of the film. Like showing the pod and ships in space. Showing the tracker beam bring in the pod and so on. The Krites themselves are even hard to find. The first one doesn't show up until almost the 50 minute mark. Even when they are around, we still see very little of them. The acting was pretty good. One thing I have liked about this series is there is always someone in each film that I knew from other horror films. It was good to see that Don Keith Opper and Terrence Mann stuck through all four of the movies.

Critters 4 was different from the rest of the movies in that it was more serious. The comedy was still there but not near as much as it was in the other movies before it. It was more serious than the first movie even. This just goes to prove that serious isn't always better. It wasn't because that Critters 4 took a turn towards being a more serious movie that made it bad. It was more that this one was actually boring. Since there is less action and horror moments, one would think they would give more time to the characters. All we really learn is that their captain isn't liked by the rest of the crew, Fran is in a bit of a power strugle with Rick and Ethan wants to get to Earth in order to see his father. The rest of the time is spent arguing with each other and trying to figure out why the station is empty. They never really say why it is empty either. They give a couple of reasons that it could be empty but why would the Counselor want to meet them in an empty station?

I'm assuming that the Counselor was Ug since he sorta knew Charlie. At first he didn't act like he did but then later it seemed more like he did actually know Charlie. From the fans point of view, it seems that it is a tie on which movie is the worst in the series. A lot of people think the third movie was the worst and a lot think this one was. I have to go with this one as being the worst in the series. As far as the series itself goes, I have enjoyed in as a whole. None of the films will be making my favorits list but it was a fun series. It starts off good but ends up draging its feet by the end.
2 out of 5 Why is it so many series end up on space at some point?

Friday, July 06, 2007

Fur Balls Part Three

That's right, I have two posts today! Told you I would do better at getting some more posts up. I watched Critters 2 and Critters 3 (1991) yesterday but didn't really feel like sitting down and writing up reviews for them. Since I didn't, I decided I would write both of them up today and make it a double review day. Call me silly but I haven't had a lot to do the past couple of days. Still swimming when I can and trying to avoid getting to wet outside of the pool which seems to be getting harder and harder to do down this way. I sure hope the rest of you are keeping dry. If it is to dry, I will be more than happy to send you some rain water. There is plenty of it around here. I'm so nice in fact, I will send it to you for free! See what a great person I am? I can be a wonderful friend as I'm sure you are all finding out. Anyways, you may or may not want to read another review so here you go.

Critters 3 starts at a camp grounds not far from Grover's Bend. We meet Clifford (John Calvin), his daughter Annie (Aimee Brooks) and his son Johnny (Christian & Joseph Cousins). They are actually only passing through but end up getting a flat. It is suggested that a Krite did this because we see some Krite eggs up under the truck later on. We also meet Josh (Leonardo DiCaprio) who happens to be at the camp grounds with his family. He ends up playing frisby with Annie and Johnny and run into Charlie (Don Keith Opper) of all people. Charlie is still hunting down Krites and takes a liking to Johnny. He gives Johnny a crystal and tells Johnny that if it ever turns green then that is the time he should take care of himself and his family. Clifford gets the tire fixed and they are on their way back to the big city. Once at their appartment building, the eggs hatch and we are ankle deep in critters once again.

The effects took a step back in this one. Critters 3 still has a PG-13 rating but I think that is simply because of all the swear words that Josh seems to like so well. The gore is a bit hard to find this time around. I don't expect a blood bath for this series but we are dealing with creatures that use their razor sharp teeth as their primary weapon. Because of that I would expect to see a lot of blood flowing. Nothing really stands out to me in this third installment. I felt the acting was very strong again though. I'm not a big Leonardo fan at all. I don't think he is cute or anything and never really cared for his acting either. That is just me though. I didn't care for him here either but not because he didn't do a good job of acting. I enjoyed Aimee Brooks the most. Don Keith Opper was the only returning cast member this time around. You will also find William Dennis Hunt, Nina Axelrod, Geoffrey Blake, Katherine Cortez, Frances Bay and Bill Zuckert. Terrence Mann also returns. I almost forgot he returned as well. That is probably because he only shows up right at the end of the movie.

Critters 3 was a bit of a disappointed me to me. I still liked it but I was disappointed by it. The critters themselves are used more as comedy instead of scares. There are still moments when they go on the attack and such but it doesn't have the same feel. The Krites are used for comedy in the other two movies but not near as much. They squeeze ketchup on each other. One pushes the face of another into a pie. Another one eats baked beans and of course gets gas from it. They have also learned some new tricks. They can start to spin real fast now and can jump real high because of that. I don't seem to recall them being able to do that in the other movies.

We learn a little bit about the Krites thanks to an older couple that live in the building. He reads all kinds of papers that are mostly made up. I'm sure you know which ones I mean. This sequel seems a little more character driven than the last one. In its defense though, we already knew some of the characters in last sequel so they didn't really have to give a lot of information about them. The main story isn't really about the Krites. Instead it is about Annie. Annie lost her mom fairly recently and her dad is having some trouble dealing with it. He expects Annie to be the woman of the house now but she doesn't feel ready to grow up just yet. I guess I liked it since I can relate to it.

As I said, I didn't like Critters 3 as much as I liked the other two. I still liked it but I would rate it under the other two if you want to get down to it. Since I could relate to the main character, maybe I enjoyed the movie a little more than I normaly would have. One more to go! I will watch it over the weekend sometime and get the review up as well. Everyone have a great time until then and I hope you all liked the double review day.
3 out of 5 Knows I'm getting tired since I keep hitting the wrong keys

Fur Balls Part Two

I'm very sorry for the long delay between posts. I got Critters 2: The Main Course (1988) in the mail but I didn't check it until I was ready to watch it. Once I was ready, I discovered that the disk had a crack running out of the center of the disc so I sent it back and asked for a new one. I will admit that Netflix was quick about this but by the time I got the disk I was busy trying to get ready for the holiday. I hope everyone did have a great holiday! I watched the neighbors with their fireworks. I like watching fireworks but the ones you can buy now days for home use are getting pretty lame anymore. They are nothing compared to what the city does with fireworks. There was also a small family emergency I had to deal with but that seems to have worked itself out in a good way. I'm hoping to make up for my slacker self and get some movies watched again.

Critters 2 picks up two years after the events in the first movie. Brad (Scott Grimes) returns to Grover's Bend where his family was attacked in the last movie. Since the last movie, Brad's family has moved away. Brad is returning to visit his grandmother (Herta Ware) who still lives in Grover's Bend. Their story was in the local papers, some believe Brad, most don't. Most people tease Brad about what he says happened and even Brad tries to tell some people that it never happened. Little does Brad know though that some Krite eggs have been found and are sold for the easter egg hunt that is about to happen at the local church. Meanwhile, we discover that Charlie (Don Keith Opper) is now a bounty hunter. He got picked up by Ug (Terrence Mann) and Lee (Gregory Patrick) at some point and is now helping them. They return to earth when they are told that the Krites are about to hatch and they will be needed. Soon after they land, Charlie finds an old playboy magazine and when Lee sees it, he begins to change and because the centerfold woman (Roxanne Kerohan). Once the eggs do hatch, you can be sure there is plently of Krite action to be found.

To me, The effects were better this time around. There still wasn't as much gore as I would have liked but I realize that because each movie is rated PG-13, I won't be seeing a lot of gore. Once again, the cattle are attacked and are chowed down on by the Krites. There is also part of a human arm with some blood, bone and an intact hand left. Nothing major but it was a little better than the first time around. The acting was the strong point again. You have a few people returning for Critters 2, Don Keith Opper, Scott Grimes, Terrence Mann and Lin Shaye. Lin was the dispatcher for the Sheriff last time and is a reporter this time around. Barry Corbin takes over the part of Harv. Harv was the Sheriff last time around but in this movie he is the ex-Sheriff since he was voted out in a "land slide." Some other new faces include Liane Alexander Curtis who becomes something of a love interest for Brad. There is also Tom Hodges, Douglas Rowe, Al Stevenson, Sam Anderson and Eddie Deezen.

I said in my review for Critters that people have said this series is a bit of a rip off of Gremlins. I didn't notice it to much in the first movie but here in Critters 2 I could see it more. One scene is where the Krites are in a fast food place eating up all the hamburgers and having a great time in general. This reminded me a lot of the bar scene in the first Gremlins movie. Critters 2 did a great job of keeping the same mood going from the first movie. It is light hearted so don't expect any real scares if you are a die hard horror fan. For younger horror fans the new Sheriff being killed in an easter bunny suit will probably scare then some as some other reviews have said. They may not remember the movie real well but they say that scene has always stuck with them. The comedy part of this series was shown a little more this time around. There is a lot more one liners and refrences to other horror movies.

I liked that two years had passed between movies and two years had passed in the story line as well. It would have been nice if they had explained why Brad's family had moved away a little better and maybe a quick update and what has happened to everyone in the family since we left them. In truth, it wouldn't have advanced the story but it still would have been a nice touch. Over all, I enjoyed Critters 2 a little more than I did Critters. There was a little more action, a little more gore, even a little bit of nudity (which made me wonder how it managed to get a PG-13 rating) and lots more Krites rolling around.The subtitles for the Krites are still there but not used as much sadly. If you enjoyed the first Critters movie then you can't go wrong with this sequel. I felt it was as good as, even a little better, than the first one.
3 out of 5 If nothing else, watch it for the giant Critter ball!