Thursday, November 23, 2006

Tribute: Dario Argento

First off, I want to say Happy Thanksgiving to all of you. I hope none of you are to miserable after eating today. I know it is easy to do. For some time now, I have been trying to figure out ways to expand my blog but still keep it horror related and keep reviews as the primary thing that I do. As I have said before, I have discovered that I really enjoy doing these reviews so I want to keep doing them. I don't really see myself as a news person, telling all of you what is going to be coming out and such since I don't really get into that to much myself. I don't go in search of news about up and coming movies, I pretty much let them find me.

I expressed this to Cattleworks and he was nice enough to offer some advice. He liked it when I reviewed all of the Blind Dead movies all in a row. That is something I have been planing to do with some other series, I have just been debating with myself on which series to do next. He also suggested that I might try and do something like a tribute. Maybe to a director or scream queen. This interested me. I will be doing both I think but this one will serve to see what you all think of it. But how to keep to, what I see as, the core of this blog? Since I have heard so many good things about the series Masters Of Horror but have yet to watch any of them, I decided that the series would be a good way to honor the director and do a review. I will warn you now, this post is going to be long winded. Before I get to it, however, I have a little favor to ask of you all. After reading this post, would you please let me know what you think of it? Would you like to see more of this type of post? Is there anything I should change or do different? Or should I just stick to reviews? So, without further ado, my tribute to the one of the masters, Dario Argento.

Dario Argento was born in Rome on July 9, 1940. Growing up, he has said in interviews, he read a lot of Edgar Allen Poe. He is quoted as saying, "Poe opened a door inside of me. It was a landscape, a new world." His first job was as a film critic. This lead to his being invited to write a script, along side Bernardo Bertolucci, for the movie Once Upon A Time In The West. Yes, a western. He wrote 14 movies before making the move to director. His first film, The Bird With The Crystal Plumage, was an international success. His first few films are considered giallos instead of straight up horror movies. The first movie that most people credit as his first true horror movie would be Suspiria. Suspiria and Deep Red are often debated among fans as to which is the better movie. Between the movies Suspiria and Inferno, Dario earned a producer credit on the George Romero movie Dawn Of The Dead. Dario helped market the film in Italy which became known there as Zombi. Zombi, from what I understand, is slightly edited and features more of the score done by Goblin. As a writer, his most well known movies, to horror fans anyways, are Demons and Demons 2. Both were directed by his friend Lamberto Bava. For a complete filography you can go to IMDb's page here

I selected Dario Argento as the first tribute for two reasons. First reason being that of late, I have been doing a lot of foreign movie reviews. I decided I might as well keep with that theme even though the movie reviewed later on is not a foreign movie but it does lead me to my second reason. Dario Argento happens to be my favorite out of the foreign directors I have watched movies from so far. It just seemed to be a logical step to me. My personal favorite Dario film would have to be Suspiria. I'm not sure if this is because it happened to be the very first Dario movie that I watched or if it has more to do with the film itself. I really got into Suspiria not because of the plot, but because of the sounds and colors that was used in the film. I had never watched a movie that relied so much on this. The directing itself, along with the sounds and colors, managed to really draw me in. I actually had to watch it a couple of times, and try to make myself not be drawn in so much, so I could figure out what the plot of the movie actually was. That became secondary to me. Some people complain about this as Dario will, at times, allow the plot to become secondary to the visuals. Dario Argento's movies are something of an aquired taste. I have noticed that for some people, they can never get into his movies.

Reviews I have done of Dario Aregnto movies are:
Deep Red
Opera
Two Evil Eyes

And now for the review. See, I told you this was going to be a long post. Dario Argento agreed to do a movie for Masters Of Horror after he was told who all else would be involved. The next step was to try and figure out what he wanted to direct for the series. After reading the comic book, which is also called Jenifer, he says it really grabed him and that is the story he wanted to do. The story was actually pitched and wrote by actor Steven Weber. Dario made some changes to it once he received the script.

Jenifer is a about Frank Spivey (Steven Weber). The movie opens with him and his partner sitting in a car trying to eat while a fly bugs them. We slowly discover that they are cops. When Frank gets out for a stretch, he spots a man pushing a woman who has her hands tied behind her. Frank yells for his partner but he has the radio up to loud to hear. Frank goes alone and soon finds the man Frank seen. The man puts the woman over a barrel and pulls out a meat cleaver. Frank pulls his gun and tells the man to drop the weapon. The man babbles on about it being to late and that Frank has no idea what is inside of this woman. Frank has no choice but to shoot the man. Before the man dies, he utters the name Jenifer. Frank then helps the woman and while we don't get to see her face yet, except for a black eye (I mean the eye itself), Frank reacts in a way that lets us know it isn't a pretty sight.

Frank tries to find out more about Jenifer (Carrie Anne Fleming) and discovers there is very little to be found out. No one seems to know who she is or where she came from. Before this, we find out a little about Frank's personal life. He has a wife and son. We find out he is upset about killing a man even though he had no choice. We also discover that his home life isn't all that great. It is never explained in detail but it is something that you can sense. His wife tries to get him to have sex and it works but his mind is flashing back to the shooting and, perhaps more importantly, Jenifer. He goes to visit Jenifer in a mental hospital and it becomes obvious that she likes him. Because she has no place to go, Frank talks himself into bringing her home with him. His wife and son are sleeping when he gets home so Frank makes a bed for Jenifer on the couch. Durring the night Jenifer hears the family cat and wakes up. She doesn't seem to like the cat to well nor does the cat like her to well either. In the morning Jenifer is in the bedroom with nothing more than a sheet covering her. Frank gets up and goes to her and it is about this time his wife comes out of the bathroom and starts to scream when she sees Jenifer. She wants Jenifer out of her house, not because she is standing next to her husband in only a sheet, but because of the way Jenifer looks. Frank refuses to just throw Jenifer out on the street though. The wife and son end up leaving soon though when they find Jenifer eating the cat. Frank, for whatever reason, still won't leave her though. At some point, he becomes obsessed with Jenifer.

The effects in Jenifer are very good. The makeup done on Carrie Anne Fleming to make her into Jenifer end up being very unnerving. She looks normal enough until you see her face. I won't try and describe it, I will instead let you watch this movie and see for yourself. The movie is also very gory at times. We see Jenifer eating the now dead cat and....well, a couple of humans as well. The acting is also very good. Steven Weber reminded me a lot of James Wood. Not only in how he acted in this movie but also because of his looks. I could probably go into more detail on both effects and acting but this post is going to be long as it is. Just know that I really don't think most people will be disappointed by either.

I was never actually scared by Jenifer but it did envoke other feelings that horror movies should envoke. It was disturbing, a bit shocking at times and, dare I say, revolting at times as well. Jenifer really surprised me in how far the film makers were willing to go with this movie. Even though this film is a bit of a departure for Dario Argento, you can still see his directing hand in the film. Overhead shots, crane shots, shots showing how nice the country side looks. Like other Dario movies, the music plays a big part. I really enjoyed it in this movie. Even though he didn't actually write the script, it is still a Dario movie.

I noticed some people are very disappointed in the plot of the movie. The plot is pretty simple really but it is there. We know nothing about Jenifer. No idea who she is. Where she came from. Was she born disfigured or did it happen later in life. None of these things are ever told. We never learn why she does, or doesn't, kill. It would seem it is because she becomes hungry, jealous and even does it to please the one she has devoted herself to. These things, and more, are left up to you. Some people don't like that but it has never bothered me at all. Jenifer comes across as playful, frightened and almost....cat like. The plot, in a way, hits on the fact that sometimes men are doing things because of their sex drive instead of what their minds are telling them. As one character put it in the movie, "How did a head like that end up on such a great body?" A must watch for all horror fans.
4 out of 5 Deformed killers

11 comments:

Jed Cooper said...

Well shucks Miss Heather, you made it back with a major bang sweet lady (standing ovation). Happy turkey day to all you horror and Heather fans too (grinning). No reason you can't be both like me (blushing and looking down at my boots scruffing up the dust). But I don't think either is a real surprise for Miss Heather (smiling).

I really like the idea of adding a tribute in whenever the urge strikes you, in addition to normal reviews. It just seems like a logical step, so tipping my hat to cattleworks for the suggestion too. It is more work for you, but as usual, you did it very well Miss Heather (clapping).

But you do still scare me a bit too pretty lady, hehehe. I think I will have to start looking over my shoulder a bit more now. (If you are being a peeping tommette, the least you can do is say hi and bat those gorgeous eyes at me.) I had recently decided to catch up on the Masters Of Horrors episodes that I have missed on cable.

The last 4 flicks NF has sent me have been MOH episodes. They still owe me about 4 more episodes. Jenifer should show up either tomorrow or Saturday hopefully (ginning).

Now I am looking forward to watching it even more. For me, reading your review of a movie I am about to watch, does not bother me at all. It might some folks, but maybe I am just too sick a puppy to have it dampen my enjoyment of the movie, lol. All I know is it does not, rather it just makes me anticipate it even more (grinning, while cleaning the blood off my newly sharpened blade).

You always balance the strong and weak points, and unless the flick is a total dog, you never spoil it for your readers (clapping). Your reviews always make me just look forward to being able to watch the movie when it shows up.

Now I am being devious I know (hehehe). I know from our chats that westerns are not a movie genre you care much for. But I really think you should force yourself to watch the first movie he helped to write Heather (grinning and ducking all those flying objects your are throwing at me now). Once Upon A Time In The West is one of my personal favorites for westerns. It has Charles Bronson, Henry Fonda, and Jason Robards in the cast.

I actually grinned like the cat who had just swallowed the canary after watching the extras on my first Argento movie you had suggested. It was then that I realized he had helped to write the script for that movie. I liked him even more then, lol. Seriously, it made me appreciate that he was not only a talented writer but a talented director too.

I remember once you suggested in a chat that I watch some foreign films to broaden my horror exposure. Argento was one of the names that you mentioned. So I added several of his flicks to my queue, then bumped them up. I have probably watched 5 or 6 of his movies now, including Suspiria, Demons, Demons 2, Deep Red and others. I have not watched Opera yet, but it is getting up near the top of my queue again.

The only real problem with all of your reviews Miss Heather, is that my queue keeps getting longer. Because I want to be able to add another comment in a timely manner, I normally bumps them up (sticks out tongue). So that just makes the ones getting up near the top wait a bit longer too, lol.

But NF (another great Heather suggestion) makes it too easy not to enjoy these movies. So when you get the chance Heather, why not give MOH: Pick Me Up by Larry Cohen a watch. It has Michael Moriarty, Warren Kole and Fairuza Balk as the main characters. I just watched it last night and am intersted to see what you think of it. I thought the basic plot was unique and really a nice twist. Sick puppy, lol, yes maam, guilty.

I don't know who the brainchild was behind the series, but I think they came up with one hell of a great idea with Masters Of Horrors. The only think I dislike is that each episode is so short, usually a bit under an hour. I would enjoy them even more if they were made more like a normal movie in length. But since most of them are based on short stories, maybe that is not totally realistic either.

From an extra Larry Cohen did, I realized that the series gives each director 10 days to shoot their episode. I was thinking damn that is not very long, and then Cohen said he could have filmed his in 7 days. But he took the 10 days for the production staff not to have their salaries messed with. Which I thought showed his class as a human being too, lol.

On a more disappointing note, I just watched the Imprint episode, directed by Takashi Miike. This was the episode that the series elected not to air because they felt it was just too much. So I really had some high hopes for this episode, being the sick puppy I am.

Personally it was a bit of a let down for me. I really don't understand why they elected not to air it really. It was not all that gory to me, as several of the episodes I have already watched on cable were much gorier. So maybe I have missed something. I am going to watch it again before I mail it back, and try to figure out what their major problem was with that episode. If you or any of your other readers can offer any insight, I would love to hear what their reasons were.

I am not trying to say it was a disappointing episode really. I enjoyed it, but not as much as I have enjoyed some of the other episodes. Maybe my expectations were just too high for it, and I felt let down by the end results.

But the more episodes of Masters Of Horrors I watch, the more I appreciate the concept and the way they give the directors such free hands to do their own things too. Of the episodes I have watched on dvd that have the extras, I have yet to hear a director not praise the series for the freedom they are given to film their chosen episode. Maybe I misundersood one director, but he seemed to suggest that the basic film crew worked for the series and were already up and in place, ready to go. A couple of directors have said they just called their favorite effects person and said come on, lets go have some fun.

Cohen seemed to appreciate how the series took a lot of the normal hassels away from him, so he could spend most of his time just directing, but without the normal interference normally encountered during filming. That may be one reason why 10 days is not really so short. The series made it so easy, he could have shot his episode in 7 days, but elected to take the full 10. So my hat is off to the series as well. Their attitude seems to make each director enjoy their time and look forward to doing other episodes later.

But personally Miss Heather, I like the idea of you doing a tribute like this to a director. I really like the idea of you paying homage to some of the great scream queens too (grinning). But then what horror fan who is a guy would not love that idea, hehehe.

I know it is much more work for you, and that your time is limited. So I don't expect to see this for each review, but when you can make the time...I for one say GREAT (smiling). But I am honest enough to admit that I am greedy for your reviews too Heather. I know that your normal reviews do not take quite so much work, so they would be more frequent.

So I don't really want to see you replace a long one for several normal ones. How about a mix of your normal ones, with a long tribute added when you can make the time. So I guess that would be my first suggestion in response to your questions.

My second suggestion would be...for you next tribute, how about doing a scream queen (grinning). Who do I want to see you pay homage to first - easy. I would enjoy seeing you start off with YOUR favorite horror queen. I think that is only fair. Since it will take much more work for you, I think it should be a lady you really enjoy putting in that extra time for.

Wow, talk about blabberfingers, lol (blushing, I mean me, not you sweet lady). Ok, I will hush for now. But once I have been able to watch Jenifer, I look forward to being able to post another comment. As a cat lover, that is the only thing you have said that I could live without, lmao. But it would bother me if she was chowing down on the family dog too, hehehe. It does sound like an intersting flick, but I could tell that from the description NF had posted for it too. You just make it sound even more interesting (smilng).

GREAT JOB Miss Heather (clapping and waving my hat in the air). Well worth the wait, but damn sweet lady, my mind was starting to think my throat had been cut...I was starving for another review (smiling). Even better than a turkey dinner for me (tips my hat).

CRwM said...

I’ve caught a couple of the MoH series, but I have yet to see Jenifer. I’m looking forward to it.

This longer format worked really well. This is a very good write up.

cattleworks said...

How fortuitous!
Last week I bought the DVD of JENIFER at Walmart (it was 9.99, so what the heck!), so I'll have to watch it now!
So far, I've read the post up until the review, so I'll be back!
But just wanted to say, "hi," and I'm glad I was able to offer some constructive suggestions.
From what I've read so far, this "longer post" was just fine!
(Like I'D be averse to LONGER posts! Pffft!)

cattleworks said...

"Blabberfingers!" HA! What a great term!

Well, I finally saw JENIFER. When I first heard about the MOH series and a little bit about who was involved and some of their projects, the two main episodes I wanted to see was Stuart Gordon's H.P. Lovecraft episode (mostly because I loved RE-ANIMATOR); and JENIFER, because I had read (and loved) the original comic book story in CREEPY magazine years ago, written by Bruce Jones and incredibly illustrated by Bernie Wrightson.

[SPOILERS-- KIND OF]
It wasn't too bad! To be honest, I'll probably appreciate the film more on ITS merits on repeat viewings, because this first time out, I couldn't help but compare the adaptation to the comic book story (like, was it necessary for Frank to be a cop? Perhaps to justify his killing the man who was about to murder Jenifer).
The gore WAS pretty impressive!
And the nudity was plentiful and... interesting.
Ok. I'm a sucker for nudity but I actually thought the sex scenes worked a little against the story. I almost felt that the sex scenes were as vigorous as they were to purely exploit the liberties of cable TV.
But, that's not actually right. I think they could have revealed just as much flesh and carnal hijinx, but I think Frank's character should have been more obviously repulsed having any sexual contact with Jenifer. And not because she's deformed, but because of the type of needy, insatiable creature she is. Although, arguably, I guess Frank's feelings during sex were ambiguous.
But, no, they play up his strange sexual attraction for Jenifer, starting with that great, awkward, clumsy sex scene with his wife.
And also that dream sequence of Jenifer beckoning him, UNdeformed. Which could have been a nice way to show the actress's face since we don't really see it under the make-up otherwise. But if they wanted to do that, I'd try to cast her in another smaller role to achieve that.
Because Frank seems to enjoy the sex, I think his downward turn emotionally comes a little out of the blue (his bender in the bar, specifically). Because his marriage seemed already troubled prior to Jenifer's appearance on the scene, so I don't think that would've bothered him so much.
I won't blab any more about the plot.

I watched one of the features, the one with Carrie Anne Fleming, mostly because I didn't know her before this. It was weird seeing footage of Argento directing her and Steven Weber, he looks like this frail, strange old guy, with his big head and hair stuck to his skull, but he seemed to have a boyish energy which was neat.
Fleming's performance emphasized Jenifer's animal nature, especially during sex, but emotionally, she does a pretty good job of depicting Argento's take that Jenifer is "pure," and "innocent" as well: she acts on her feelings and she's completely guileless. Sometimes it's very affecting, when she craves affection and snuggles against Frank like a pitiful pet cat hungering for attention. Sometimes its damn disgusting, like when she's hungry and we see her big tongue with bits of food all over it, or she's drooling copiously. And okay, its also unfortunate that her "pure" impulses lead to homicidal actions... but the emotion behind these actions are very childlike.

But, Jed, you're right: I could see how this episode could've gone a little longer, although feature length may be pushing it.

And finally, I thought this was a great post! It probably does require extra work to get it together, so that's probably a bite in the tush for you, Heather, from that point-of-view; but your faithful, greedy readers luck out with an extra meaty offering.

Thumbs up to you!

Anonymous said...

Hi Heather, I really enjoy reading your reviews, and anything new you can add to them makes them all that much better!! Truth is, I am not that much of a horror fan, but I do enjoy the passion and insight you put into this. Of course I have been a fan of yours for a very long time, which is how I found this blog to begin with. For my two cents, just keep doing whatever drives your passion for this or anything else in life, including your swimming!! Happy Thankgiving to you also!! Trapper

Heather Santrous said...

Thanks for the kind words Trapper.

Cattleworks: What I took away from Jenifer is that men are repulsed by her but at the same time strangly attracted to her at the same time. To me I could see both feelings with Frank. Like when she came to him in bed. I don't think her really wanted to be with her but once they were he just went with it. After the movie is over you can see this was happening with the first guy we come across and can see it happening all over again with the hunter at the end of the movie.

On a side note, since I forgot to say this in the review, watch the very first interview in the extras. It is an interview with Dario and it shows two scenes that were slightly edited.

cattleworks said...

Yeah, I've been watching some of the extra features since last night.
Those cuts were something! Not much in terms of time cut out, but the images i thought were pretty strong for what Americans are used to watching.
Of course, Europeans, they have totally different sensibilities of what's proper!

I forgot to mention: when Frank's kid calls Jenifer a Morlock, I thought that was funny. Then I realized that was pretty sly in terms of referencing. She does resemble a Morlock (and my reference is the 60s TIME MACHINE with Rod Taylor), but I thought the comic book version of her looked EXTRA Morlocky, those great bulbous eyes, that grotesque mouth and dental work.
Hmm... maybe it was "sly" to me. Perhaps it was ridiculously blatant to others.

The feature with Steven Weber I thought was interesting because he discusses his screenplay adaptation of the comic story. And he mentions being taken by the disturbing combo of hot bod and hideous countenance.
I just found the whole sexual aspect of her character disturbing because "Frank" (in the comic-- I don't think his name was actually Frank, tho') comes across as being subjected to her amorous advances rather than responding to them. So that dimension to their relationship was distrubing for me.

Finally, the other thing I like about the tribute was your personal take on Argento's films, how his use of colors, music and camera angles affected you (especially during SUSPIRIA).
In the same way that it's interesting to read what horror films you like, the personal aspect of why they affect you is fun to know. And humanizing as well.

CRwM said...

I know this is a bit late to the party, but while cruising about various horror blogs, I found one gent who actually has scans of the original story.

http://david-z.blogspot.com/2006/11/jenifer-by-jones-and-wrightson-just-say.html

He is considerably harder on the adaptation, but to each their own.

It is interesting what a larger role sex plays in the film version of the story, given your description.

Hoped you might find it interesting.

Heather Santrous said...

It is interesting, thank you for that link. It is really hard for someone that is a big fan of a writen source material to enjoy a movie/tv show that has been made out of that material.

As much as I want to like a movie that has been made out of a story that I really enjoyed, I rarely do. It just seems to be really hard to translate these to the big screen for some reason. For one, they always want to change the sorce material to make it better for the screen. I never really understood this, some things maybe but it didn't become popular because the source wasn't 'better' to start with. It became popular for a reason so why monkey with it?

I never read the comic story of JENIFER so I can't say if it is as good as the movie or not. I tried to read the scans on the link you gave but some of the words are to small for me to read. I could spot things that were kept the same in the movie however. To be truthful, how can a story that short be made into an hour long movie without being added to?

cattleworks said...

Yes.
YES!
It seems the general rule of thumb is, if you LOVED the book (and by extrapolation, comic book, graphic novel, comic strip, etc.), the cinematic adaptation of same will suffer by comparison.
Since I don't play video games, I don't know if that adaptation scenario translates similarly.
When i first saw HARRY POTTER AND THE SORCERER'S STONE, I was personally affronted by director Chris Columbus' handling of the way Harry was taken by Prof. McGonnegal away from the class on flying brooms. I didn't think he properly handled Harry's worry and dread about being thrown out of Hogwarts (or so he thought).
Obviously, that was incredibly subjective (Columbus is a bonehead!).
JAWS is one of the few films I know about that seems to have improved on the book. BUT, I saw the movie first, which may also be a significant part of that opinion.
In hindsight, if I had not read JENIFER first, I think I would've outright loved the film. But knowing both, it's incredibly difficult not to compare the two treatments.

WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD!

I felt the ending of the film was a little rushed. In the comic, there was more of a sense that Jenifer had some weird "power," that Frank's character didn't accidentally come across her and the man that was going to kill her in the beginning.
I thought it was neat in the comic that Frank brings her out to the woods, but once there he can't bring himself to kill her, simply staring at her pathetic tied up form waiting on the ground, her huge Morlock eyes staring at him, silently. Some time goes by, and then he hears the sound of someone coming, and he realizes that the cycle is about to continue again, which renews his resolve to kill her. But by the time he tries to act, he's cut down by another "savior", and all he has time left to do as he dies is say, "Jenifer."
And regarding my earlier comment about Frank's dream of Jenifer beckoning him, but undeformed... instead of having that dream, (or specifically, a dream with a beautiful Jenifer) I would have double-cast Fleming as the psychiatrist Frank talks to when he's asking what they know about Jenifer's background.
So there!

Jed Cooper said...

Well Miss Heather, I just had the chance to finally watch "Miss Jenifer" thanks to NF breaking my log jam. I guess my first reaction is simply WOW, I loved this sucker, hehehe. I am slowly but surely trying to watch all of the MOH series. I would have to say that to date, this is clearly the best episode I have seen yet.

You were right not to try to describe the makeup job on Fleming, because there is no way mere words could do it justice (grinning). Watching the extras really added to my appreciation of this episode as well. You could see the enthusiasm in Fleming, and how much she enjoyed and put herself totally into her part. I really enjoyed the segment on her makeup as well.

Not to try to argue with such a pretty lady, because I truly do so often agree with your views on your movie reviews Heather. I also understand and appreciate that you reserve your rare 5 for a flick that scares you. I appreciate that reservation, but honestly for me being scared by a flick stopped happening so long ago I have simply quit hoping for it now.

As I have said before, about the most I can hope for now is a slight shiver and/or a grin along with a "very nice". Jenifer did not give me any shivers, but it did give me several grins and "very nice" moments. So I think I would have to give this episode one of my rare 5s as well.

So all I can say is thank you for reviewing this episode and liking it so much Miss Heather. I have watched it three times and still grin at certain parts.

I did not expect it to be left in after seeing it, but I was really impressed with the deleted scene of Jenifer with the store owner's son, down in the basement. I wish they had been brave enough to leave that scene in, but am not surprised they elected to cut it. But it seemed to fit in so well with the other scenes to me, and simply made perfect sense. It clearly helped to illustrate that not only was she extremely sexual, but reacting with animal instincts as well. Ok, I do know I am a MAJOR SICKIE, so what can I say (grinning wildly).

But an episode like Jenifer simply confuses me even more about Takashi Miike's episode Imprint, they the show elected not to air. If the gore and eerie feelings of Jenifer are say a 10, Imprint might get maybe a 6 for me at best on both. So I really have to scratch my head now in trying to understand the decision to shelve that episode. I read a blurb on a web site that was offering the episode for sale, and they claimed it was viewed as being much too gory to be aired. Jenifer has it heads and shoulders over Imprint in its effects...so that just does not work.

Sorry to take so long to get this comment posted Miss Heather, but blame the NF log jam from the holiday I reckon. But Jenifer was truly worth the wait for me. Again thanks for writing this one up you gorgeous sick puppy you (smiling, tips my hat).