Tuesday, September 23, 2014

A New Ghostman On The Block

Even though I intended to get a couple of reviews in this last weekend, in the end I didn't get a single review in. Hopefully I can make up for that this week. I have three other reviews planned for here, I just need to get busy writing them. Over at my other blog, I managed to get another review done there. The last film, the late night feature, from a couple of Friday's ago: Call Girl Of Cthulhu. An interesting title to be sure. Saturday opened with a film called Son Of Ghostman (2013). I said in my last review that not all films screened were really horror films. This was another one like that. It isn't a horror film, but has to do with the horror genre in a way at least.

Denny (Devin Ordoyne) has recently lost his job and is unsure what to do with his life now. He does have a bit of an obsession with an old horror TV show that features his favorite horror host, Ghostman. Recently a new horror host is taking hold, Count Dracool, who Denny has a strong dislike for. For one thing, he has known Rick (Kurt Larson) since high school, and he feels that Rick has no respect for those that came before him. The fact that Count Dracool is also trying to sell his own brand of sun screen isn't going over too well with Denny either. Denny goes to a live shoot for Count Dracool's show, where the guy who once played Ghostman is to make an appearance. Rick doesn't treat the guy to well, which of course makes Denny mad, but Denny does meet Claire (Angela Gulner). Once home, Denny gets drunk and put on makeup like his idol Ghostman. He sets up a video camera and goes on a rant about Count Dracool. Denny is awakened by Zack (Matthew Boehm) the next day. After finding out what happened, Zack takes the video and uploads it the internet, which becomes a popular video. After a lot of talking by Zack, Denny decides to do his own show as the Son of Ghostman. He enlists the help of his best friend Carlo (Marlon Correa) to help with everything. Is this something that Denny really wants to do though?

Son Of Ghostman was written/directed by Kurt Larson. The film is more of a romance than anything else. There is a good healthy dose of comedy as well, but more of the smart ass type of comedy. As I said above, nothing about Son Of Ghostman gives it a horror movie feel. There is a lot about the horror hosts we see on TV, which is a common theme at horror conventions anymore. Even though I was disappointed that this wasn't a horror film, at least Apocalypse Kiss had murders in it, I still have to give Son Of Ghostman its due. For a film I wasn't expecting much out of, it was really a nice surprise. The main story is Denny trying to figure out what he wants out of life, and coming to terms with himself as well. The possible romance between Denny and Claire isn't forced and doesn't take away from the rest of the story. Things do get a little slow here and there. My only other complaint is that we don't get to see Denny's show enough. That is really too bad since I thought that is when the movie really shined.

The acting and the interaction between the different actors was great. I ended up being really impressed by Devin Ordoyne. He was charming and often funny. The way he plays up being Son of Ghostman was a little surprising to me, but it works very well. The constant bickering between Zack and Carlo was also funny. The romance between Denny and Claire builds slowly, which was nice because it wasn't love at first sight type thing. Matthew Boehm was the only actor that I thought could have been better. I only say that because he mostly only had one facial expression it seemed like.

I was surprised at how well Son Of Ghostman worked for me. I think it was a nice surprise for everyone that was there as well. There was a lot of laughter at times, and there was a nice applause for it at the end of the film as well. It would have been nice to have seen an entire episode of Denny's show, besides the one we do see towards the end that is. I hope that other horror fans will give Son Of Ghostman a chance. It is a fun movie that is a joy to watch.
4 out of 5 I will the horror hosting to someone else

Friday, September 19, 2014

Kissing The End Of The World

I think I'm about over my cold now, at least I sure hope so. I've been feeling a lot better, especially compared from a week ago. Anyway, a couple of weekends ago I went to see a bunch of movies. While I was excited to be able to bring some news of upcoming films, being sick quickly put a damper on that. I'm not sure if I can reach my goal of ten reviews in a month now because of that, but it is what it is. I have already written a review for the first film I went to seem, which was called The Hanover House. Be sure to check out that review. The second film that I watched was called Apocalypse Kiss (2014).

Set sometime in the future, Jerry Hipple (Tom Detrik) is an agent trying to track down a serial killer. The Red Harvest Killer, also known as Adrian (D.C. Douglas), has been killing people for some time now. When Katia (Carmela Hayslett) and Gladys (Tammy Jean) come to town and also start killing people, for their own reasons, they get the credit for the other killings as well. This of course doesn't go over to well with Adrian, who starts leaving clues to prove there are different killers in town. That could just be what Hipple wants though.

I was a bit confused as to why Apocalypse Kiss was being shown with horror films. It is sci-fi of course, along with some crime noir thrown in for good measure as well. I'm assuming this was one of the films the sponsor wanted screened because horror film would have been one of the last thing I would have used to describe this movie. This wasn't why I ended up not liking this one though. I kept thinking that there had to be more to the plot, but there never was. Because of that, I couldn't really get into the story too much. Writer/director Christian Grillo provides an interesting world to look at. Not sure how futuristic it was, but Grillo at least gave us some interesting characters. I really liked Gladys for some reason, and I thought a character that Katia ends up killing (I think it was a character called The Wizard, but I could be wrong) along with a girl on the screens around him were also interesting. I guess I just couldn't get into the main characters of Hipple and Adrian. Although Adrian did have some funny lines, he was a little too weird for me. As things come to a head, with mostly all the main character converging, I did find the plot a bit more interesting, but it just wasn't enough really. On top of that, right after the main plot comes to a close, we find out none of it mattered at all since the world is about to end.

As I said above, the world created was interesting to look at. I'm sure this is where the special effects budget went towards, as there wasn't much for horror effects to be found. People are killed, but there was nothing all that gory about it. The acting was pretty good. Even though I couldn't get into some of the characters, it had nothing to do with the acting. In truth, I had more fun finding actors that would show up here and there that were known to me. Tom Atkins has a few scenes and plays another agent that is helping with the investigation. Michael Berryman also shows up, but as far as I know was just a talking head on a blimp as can be seen in the poster above. Lloyd Kaufman also shows up, as the President no less.

I could be wrong, but I don't think Apocalypse Kiss was well received. It did get some laughs here and there, but I didn't notice anyone really getting into the film. This wasn't the only film that was screened that didn't really fit into the horror genre, but the other one was much better. I will be reviewing that one in the next few days hopefully. There was a surprise when it came to nudity in the film. Tammy Jean has some nude scenes as well as some guy. That was the surprise, as there isn't many films that has nudity from a guy in it. I'm pretty sure that Apocalypse Kiss is out on DVD, as Netflix has it where you can save it to your DVD queue. If this type of film sounds like something you would get into, then I do encourage you to check it out. It wasn't a bad film really, just not one I got into.
2 out of 5 It's the end of the world as we know it....

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Showers For The Baby

I'm a bit behind on doing reviews. I had a busy weekend and then Sunday night I started to get a sore throat. My throat isn't sore anymore, but it has turned into a full blown head cold. I have plenty to write about, it is just a matter of staying awake to write, which I haven't been doing a very good job of. The movie I skipped over to write about Hypothermia was Baby Shower (2011). This film sounded interesting to me, as was filmed in Chile, so I decided to check it out.

Angela (Ingrid Isensee) will be having her baby soon. She has been living in a cabin in the forest. There is a bit of a cult that lives near by, mostly lead by Soledad (Patricia Lopez). Angela has invited her four friends in order to have a baby shower for her twins. As it turns out, Angela has another reason to have them all there. While the friends are, or were, close, Angela suspects that one of them has stolen away her husband, who is ready to leave on a trip with someone. Angela is going to find out which of her friends has stabbed her in the back. But, the cult also has plans for everyone, but what could those be?

Baby Shower surprised me is some ways. I didn't notice it at the time, but another review compared the characters of the movie to those of Sex In The City. Even though the characters in Baby Shower aren't as close, I could see the comparison easily. Not that I watched that show. I gave it a try seeing how popular it was getting, didn't see it and gave up on it fairly quickly. Some attribute the whole who slept with/stealing my husband away plot to soup operas that are popular in Chile. Either way, I thought it was a nice way to keep things interesting before the horror part of the story kicks in. While writer director Pablo Illanes tries to throw us off at first with who is doing what to the guests, it isn't hard at all to figure out who is really behind it. I liked the turn once it is made though. The viciousness boarders on "torture porn" at times. This was something that I enjoyed though since it elevated the film, in my view at least. The violence didn't always make sense, but whatever. However, this is also when some problems started to creep in. Baby Shower is very guilty of making it look like someone has died, only to have them not so dead later on. I had to admit that it was something that was getting pretty old quickly. Another problem was that characters were turning on each other for no real reason at times, that I could understand at least. This didn't happen with the friends so much as it did with the cult members. I understood the backstabbing at times with the cult members, but most of the time I was just confused by it. If you can't trust someone stupid enough to be in a cult with you, who can you trust??

The effects get pretty gory in places. People get shot, caught in bear traps and a foot gets knocked off. There is more as well to be found. The effects were all well done. The foot coming off was probably the best one to be found. The acting was also pretty good. I didn't really care for Ingrid Isensee in the lead role, but I think that had more to do with the character than her. I liked the acting by the friends of the lead character as well, but I really thought that Patricia Lopez stole the movie. She was great and had some scary looking crazy faces to go with her acting. Not that anyone here probably knows the actors, but you can also find Claudia Burr, Kiki Rojo, Francisca Merino, Sofia Garcia, Alvaro Gomez and Pablo Krogh.

Do we ever find out if anyone is stealing Angela's husband? Yes and no. While the questions she wants answered, there seems to be more to the answer than we get to find out. By then, the question no longer really matters, except to Angela still for some reason. A lot of people put down Baby Shower and I was surprised by this when I started reading others thoughts. It doesn't have the best rating on IMDb either, currently at 4.3 stars. I had a very good time with it, despite the problems which didn't bug me that bad. I was just surprised at how mean spirited the film is. There is even a rape scene that felt pretty real. Not the most graphic, but showed enough. If this one shows up again on instant watch, don't think it can be had by DVD on Netflix, I would highly recommend giving it a watch.
4 out of 5 You can now join the cult of Heather

Friday, September 05, 2014

Fishing In The Cold

It has been a little while since I last got a review in. I haven't felt like writing too much lately, partly because I have just felt so tired. I did manage to watch a couple of movies though. There was two right at the start of the month that was being taken out of my instant watch queue that I couldn't get on DVD, so I decided to go ahead and watch them both. I will get to the first movie later on, but I wanted to write about the second one first which was Hypothermia (2010). I don't know why I want to write about it first, but just go with it, right?

Ray (Michael Rooker) is all set for his vacation with his family. They are at their favorite spot where Ray has been ice fishing for a long time. He is with his wife Helen (Blanche Baker) and his son David (Benjamin Forster), along with David's girlfriend Gina (Amy Chang). Things don't start well though when Ray is out checking the ice and falls through without anyone knowing it. David finds him though, and Ray lives to fish another day. The next day they pick a spot to fish at and settle in. Things are very quiet because David and Gina have something to tell his parents that may not go over to well. Before they know it, Cote (Don Wood) and his son Steve (Greg Finely) show up not too far away with all kinds of stuff that makes plenty of noise. Even though Cote is the type of guy to get on most people's nerves, Ray does his best to keep things nice and civil. Meanwhile, we know something is under the ice, as we see it from its point of view at times. As it turns out, whatever it is, isn't very nice.

Hypothermia is a film that was never all that bad, until you reach the end of it. Writer/director James Felix McKenney gives us a film that is a short 73 minutes, but still manages to tell its story in an unhurried fashion. The pacing for the film isn't bad at all, and we get a pretty good idea of who everyone is. The contrast between the two families is interesting. While I don't really think that Cote means to come off as abrasive as he does, one can tell that his son knows full well who people see his dad. Ray and his family are the quiet types that seem to keep to themselves. Cote and Steve love their toys, the louder the better at times. It keeps things interesting even if we know this isn't the true conflict that is going to play out. The creature laying in wait is where things will get into horror movie turf. Even when the creature makes itself fully known, Hypothermia is still about the two families and having them butt heads even when they know they shouldn't be. It keeps things interesting and moving along even when the action has slowed down. The creature can poison a person in some way as well, which I don't think actually kills (though we never find out for sure), but makes a person weak enough that the creature doesn't have to work for its prey anymore. The characters assume the creature is after them as food. This is never shown, but is a good of a guess as anything else. It was all well and good, nothing great but still very enjoyable, until we get to the end of the film. While that last few try to make it off the lake, they head right towards a hole in the ice. Even if they had forgotten it was there from the day before, they should have been able to see it all the same. What happens next is perhaps one of the silliest endings I have seen in a long while.

The creature isn't the best man in a rubber suit design out there, but I didn't find it as bad as a lot of people seem to. We don't see it all that much anyway, so I didn't see the big deal about it. The other effects were nicely done. The film actually gets somewhat gory in places. There are some nasty looking cuts at times with lots of blood for the one you would really expect that there would be. We also get a body ripped in half. While we don't get to see it a lot, it was still a good effect. The acting was also well done. Michael Rooker more the proved he can play something other than the tough guy that is expected from him. I though Blanche Baker did a fine job with her role, it did get a little old seeing her play everything out in the same manner. Don Wood was also very good. His character reminded me of a neighbor I had once. Not as out going as Cote seemed to be, but the guy sure loved his toys.

One odd thing that happened is even though Cote has a couple of rifles ready to go, he never goes for them. He always uses his pistol instead. I know a pistol is probably better for something up close, but it wouldn't have hurt to have someone else there with one of the rifles either. Hypothermia is a tough call to make. While I enjoyed the film up until the end of it, I still have a hard time letting all of you know to check it out because of the ending. I would still watch Hypothermia again though. If I ever do, I will probably just tune out the ending while doing something else. I guess I will just say to watch at your own risk because of the poor ending.
3 out of 5 I'm glad it don't get that cold here

Friday, August 29, 2014

The Ten Plagues Are Back

My goal has been reached for the second month in a row. Just four more to get through. I will hopefully get one more in this month if all goes well and I can get this review done before I fall asleep. It has been a busy day at work, so feeling rather tired today. Anyway, my next review will likely be for Top Horror Movies Club, so I will post a link for it once I have it done. For here I watched The Reaping (2007). I remember when this movie came out, and I had wanted to watch it then, but for whatever reason I never got around to it. I probably would have watched it much sooner, but I tend to keep putting newer films at the top of my queue.

Katherine (Hilary Swank) is someone who has decided to debunk religious miracles. She was once a missionary with a husband and little girl. Both died and now Katherine has lost her faith in God. So far she has yet to meet a miracle that can't be explained by science. She is asked to come out to a small town called Haven where a young child was found dead. The river in which the child was found has turned red and the fish are dying. Katherine decides to investigate the phenomena because another child is in danger, because the town folk seem to think she has something to do with it. Katherine's assistant Ben (Idris Elba) heads out to Haven with her and they soon find the river. While walking around in the river, frogs begin to fall seemingly from the sky. Katherine encounters Loren (AnnaSophia Robb), who is being blamed for things. But who or what is really causing the plagues, and are they on our side?

I admit that I was a bit confused by The Reaping at first. I don't know if the story was a little confusing, or maybe I wasn't giving it enough attention at first. I thought that Loren was the child that was killed for a good while. If they said otherwise prior to first seeing Loren on screen, then I just missed it. Early on they give Loren a supernatural feel. She causes people to have visions when she is touched or touches someone, and can quickly disappear when she needs to. I guess this is why I thought she was a ghost or something like that at first. It turns out that she is alive and well, but has powers so to speak. Once I had the story straight, I just had to figure out who's side Loren is on. Director Stephen Hopkins does a good job at keeping one guessing as to what is really going on. While religion plays a big part in the story, I didn't feel it was beating us over the heads with it...until the end. I was enjoying the film until it came to the point that Katherine needed to regain her faith. The story had been leaning that way for some time, but I wasn't really sure if that was the direction it was actually going to take. Once it rounded that corner and made it official, I started losing interest. I'm not against religion, just not into it much at all. I have liked other films that deal with religion though, but The Reaping wasn't really one of them this time around. I didn't hate this film or anything. In fact the mystery of who is actually bad kept me into it. I didn't think that the payoff was all that great though.

There wasn't a lot of effects to be found, and what is there looked to be all CGI. They weren't really bad, but they are easy to spot all the same. Nothing gory happens, which was a bit of a disappointment. The acting wasn't too bad. I liked Swank's character more than I liked her really. She isn't a bad actress at all, don't get me wrong. David Morrissey has a fairly big role in the film. I guess one could call him the male lead. There is a sex scene between the two that seems to have caused some confusion. It seemed pretty obvious that the two characters wanted to have sex with each other, but for some reason, some people seem to think Katherine was forced into it. Either she was drugged or had too much to drink, which of course didn't seem the case to me.

In some ways The Reaping reminded me of the film The Seventh Sign. I can't say that I have all that many horror films that use the ten plagues as a plot point, so that was refreshing and was what got me into the film. Well, that and a scientific explanation for such things. Even though I was disappointed with the ending, and the news right at the end of the film that Katherine can easily get around if she wants to, it wasn't that bad of a movie overall. If you haven't watched this one yet...I'm not really going to suggest going out to find it. I will leave this one up to all of you. If it sounds interesting then by all means give it a try. It was worth a watch to me, and I will likely watch it again if I should catch it on somewhere. If it doesn't sound all that interesting then you can always find something else to watch.
3 out of 5 Science rules!

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

What If Re-Animator Was A Comedy?

I had to take one of my cats to the vet after work, which left me enough time to get a movie in, but not enough time to get the review started. I got the cat back home now, so hopefully I can get the meds down her that she needs. Anyway, that has been my excitement for the week so far outside of work. Not very exciting is it? I watched the next film on the DVD from the movie pack I'm working through, which would be Reanimator Academy (1992). While a horror movie, sort of anyway, I didn't really get how the movie made it onto the movie pack since it is more bad comedy than anything else.

Edgar Allen Lovecraft has been working on bringing the dead back to life. He lives at a college frat house, DED Heads as they like to be called, and looks older than everyone else there. One day, while going over his notes, he feels he has discovered something that will work. Testing on a head that he has been carrying around, and it comes back to life. Fred the head likes to crack jokes a lot. Meanwhile, a couple of gangsters are upset with Hotlips, a hooker. They feel that Hotlips has been holding money from them, so they kill her. Except the lead gangster then decides it was a mistake to kill here since she was the love of his life. They ready about Edgar in a newspaper, and decide to take Hotlips over to him so he can bring her back to life. It works, but women react...differently to being brought back to life.

I'm assuming that someone out there would like the humor in this movie, but it missed the mark with me a lot. I don't mind comedy in my horror films, but rarely does a spoof work for me. The director, listed as Judith Priest, mixes in some odd styles that I'm not really sure how anyone filming it thought it would be all that funny. Hotlips and the gangsters, I'm not listing the actors because character names aren't listed on IMDb and very few were even in the credits of the film, had a 1920's feel to them. This had a lot to do with the way they dressed, but I don't think the comedy aspects are too far off for that time period between the three either. Then there is Fred the head, who throws out jokes are more modern, I suppose anyway, he does use a lot of head jokes. Even though they generally film the head in a way you can't see what is controlling it, once in a while we do get to see the arm leading into the head. As for the horror part of the film, it isn't much at all. Hotlips is shot to death off camera, which all were in the face apparently. Hotlips goes on a killing spree once she figures out she is super strong now and can knock someone's head off with one punch.

This of course leads to the effects for Reanimator Academy, which are as simple as they can possibly get. The gunshot wounds look more like bug bites. The dead body we see being carried in for Edgar to bring back to life is obviously a mannequin wrapped in a sheet. The heads that Hotlips punches off also appear to be mannequins. The acting was okay for this type of movie I suppose. The timing of the jokes wasn't to bad for the most part, and no one was acting like they were reading their lines. Can't say I was impressed with anyone though. There was some nice eye candy to be found in the background at times, but no nudity.

Something that didn't make a lot of sense to me was that the gangsters and Edgar was trying to follow Hotlips while picking up knocked off heads in her wake. While it did make me smile a little the way they were doing this at times, I had to wonder what happened to the bodies the heads were attached to. The bodies just disappeared. Normally I reserve my lowest score for films that I feel are really bad that also have really bad acting. Reanimator Academy doesn't completely fit that, but I just wasn't into this movie at all. I know I will never watch it again, which generally I might watch a 2 star rated film again someday. As for all of you, unless I made you really curious about Reanimator Academy somehow, then I wouldn't bother with it if I was you.
1 out of 5 At least it made me want to watch Re-Animator again

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Never Crash On Government Land

I feel better about getting 10 reviews in this month now. With just two more to go, and a whole week in front of me, I don't see why I won't at least get 10 in. Since I had such a piss poor start for the first half of the year, I'm hoping to drop in 10 posts each month at the last half. With that in mind, I checked my instant watch list and noticed that Area 407 (2012) will be taken out in a few days. Since I was looking to watch something off that list, it seemed like a good a time as any to give this movie a try.

Sisters Trish (Abigail Schrader) and Jessie (Samantha Lester) are flying from NY to LA on a late flight New Years Eve. Trish is using her older sister's video camera and is talking and filming pretty much everyone she meets. Trish and Jessie start to talk to Jimmy (James Lyons), a photographer, and Laura (Melanie Lyons), who we later find out is a Federal air marshal. Just after the new year rings in, the plane starts to get into some very bad turbulence and then they go down. A few people survive the crash and they decide to wait near what is left of the plane in case rescue crews show up. After an hour though, no one has come. As they try to decide on what to do next, something large attacks one of them and the rest decide it is no longer a good idea to stay put.

I don't know why, but I seem to be watching a fair share of found footage type films lately. Area 407 actually falls squarely into that sub-genre. Instead of a film that is just shot in a first-person point of view, this "film" is actually found by someone. This style of filming doesn't always bug me too much. I still get annoyed by the camera moving around so much at times, but that seems to be the direction film makers are going these days. My complaining about it isn't going to change it much. Area 407 annoyed me in some different ways though. According to IMDb, co-directors Dale Fabrigar and Everette Wallin shot this in 5 days and all the lines are ad-libbed by the cast. To be honest, it shows...a lot. Sometimes the actors seem to stumble over what they are wanting to say. This bugged some people, but I do that when I get angry/excited over something and talk to fast. What I found kind of neat about the story was that more than one person would hold the camera and film. Being dark out almost the entire film, I can get why they never left the camera behind, it was a source of light for them. I could tell that the director had a hand in what was being filmed though. A good example of this was before the first attack. We can hear someone yelling, along with some strange animal noises. Three of the survivors are yelling back, trying to get a response from whoever is out there. The person filming at that time goes from person to person filming them and their reactions instead of filming where all the noises are coming from. Since stuff like that happens a lot, one has to wonder why the person holding the camera isn't worried about whatever is out there and is busy filming everyone else.

The story was alright. Even though we don't get a good look at what is after our survivors until the very end of the film, it isn't hard to figure out what it is from the small glimpses that we do get prior to that. Despite something hunting people down, there are no effects and no kills shown on screen. Th emost we get for effects are cuts and lots of blood on the survivors. More often than not, we hear a noise and then we are told by someone that one of the others is now gone. Once in a while something is shown being dragged away by something unseen or being thrown through the air, that is it basically. The acting was okay. I wasn't really all that impressed by anything, but didn't feel anyone was cringe worthy either. I don't think that Abigail Schrader is as bad in the film as a lot of people seem to think, but to each their own. She is rather annoying at first, but doesn't say or do much once the crash happens. Personally I thought that James Lyons was the best of the bunch. Brendan Patrick Connor does a good job of being the asshole of the group. Never wanting to really do what the rest come up with and gets into arguments often. There is also Ken Garcia and Samantha Sloyan who have smaller roles, but are still around a while.

Another thing that annoyed me was Laura not explaining who she is. I get it on the flight, she isn't supposed to be known. I don't really see a reason to hide it longer after the crash though. It isn't until an hour goes by, and someone gets attacked, that she explains who she is. I didn't see the point of not explaining it sooner when people are hurt and fighting about what to do next.The ad-libbing everything isn't the first time a found footage film has gone that way. While allowing the actors to ad-lib everything doesn't happen often for a film, it does give it a bit more sense of being real. However, I hope that the two directors will take a bit more than 5 days to film next time in order to fix some problems. One of the few things I can come up with was the ending. It wasn't something I was expecting to happen, although it makes sense. If you haven't watched Area 407 yet, I wouldn't have you rush out to watch it. While not everyone gives it bad reviews, they are a little harder to find. I can't say that I flat out hated this one, but it came pretty close for me. Area 407 must have done something right though since there is a sequel out there for it...I think. IMDb lists it as released, and there is a poster and trailer out there, but I can't find it anywhere.
2 out of 5 At least it wasn't aliens attacking everyone